— Assume χ continuous. Let μ∈C′(G), f∈C(X). Then: (i) μ and f are convolvable relative to β. (ii) Formula (3) of No. 1 defines for every x∈X a convolution product μ∗βf that is continuous and is none other than the element γχ(μ)f defined by the continuous representation γχ of G in C(X); moreover, the mapping (μ,f)↦μ∗βf is hypocontinuous relative to the equicontinuous subsets of C′(G) and the compact subsets of C(X). (iii) If in addition f∈K(X), then the product μ∗βf of (ii) belongs to K(X) and the mapping (μ,f)↦μ∗βf is hypocontinuous relative to the equicontinuous subsets of C′(G) and the compact subsets of K(X).
We know that μ and f are convolvable (§3, No. 2, Prop. 8 (i)). On the other hand, with the notations of §2, we have
γχ(μ)f=∫(γχ(s)f)dμ(s)∈C(X) since
C(X) is complete. In particular, for every
x∈X,
(γχ(μ)f)(x)=∫(γχ(s)f)(x)dμ(s). This, combined with Prop. 2 (i), and §2, No. 6, proves (ii). Finally, if
f∈K(X) then
μ∗(f⋅β) has compact support (§3, No. 2, Prop. 9), therefore
μ∗βf∈K(X). For, let us consider the continuous representation
U of
G in the completion
K(X)∼ obtained by extending by continuity the continuous operators
γχ(s) in
K(X) (§ 2, No. 1,
Remark 3). Let
S be the support of
μ. The functions
γχ(s)f, for
s∈S, have their support contained in a fixed compact set
K. The set
K(X,K) is a complete linear subspace of
K(X). Therefore
U(μ)f∈K(X). One sees as before that
U(μ)f=μ∗βf, and (iii) again follows from § 2, No. 6.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.