Assume χ a continuous multiplier and each function χ(s,⋅) bounded. (i) The function s↦ρ(s)=supx∈Xχ(s−1,x) on G is lower semi-continuous >0 and satisfies ρ(st)≤ρ(s)ρ(t) for all s,t in G. (ii) Let μ∈Mρ(G) and f∈L∞(X,β).¹ Then μ and f are convolvable and μ∗βf is given locally almost everywhere by the formula (3) of No. 1. One has μ∗βf∈L∞(X,β), and ∥μ∗βf∥∞≤∥μ∥ρ∥f∥∞.
¹For a function f, the expression "f∈L∞(X,β)" is an abuse of notation signifying that, depending on the context, the symbol f is to be interpreted either as a function or the equivalence class of a function. In particular, the symbol μ∗βf can stand for either a function defined locally β-almost everywhere, or the equivalence class of such a function for the relation of equality locally β-almost everywhere.
(iii) *If, moreover, f∈C∞(X) (resp. K(X)), then formula (3) of No. 1 defines for every x a convolution product μ∗βf that belongs to C∞(X) (resp. K(X)).
(iv) *If f∈K(X), then the convolution product μ∗βf defined by (3) is none other than the element γχ(μ)f defined by the continuous representation γχ of G in K(X).
The identity χ(st,x)=χ(s,tx)χ(t,x) implies at once that ρ(st)≤ρ(s)ρ(t). On the other hand, ρ is lower semi-continuous, being the upper envelope of continuous functions.
Let μ∈Mρ(G). By Prop. 1 of No. 1, μ and 1 are convolvable; Prop. 2 (i) shows that (∣μ∣∗β1)(x)≤∫Gρ(s)d∣μ∣(s) locally β-almost everywhere. Therefore, if f is β-measurable and ∣f∣≤1, then μ and f are convolvable and N∞(μ∗βf)≤∫ρ(s)d∣μ∣(s). Moreover, μ∗βf is given locally almost everywhere by formula (3) of No. 1, because condition (iii) of Prop. 2 of No. 1 is satisfied. This implies (ii).
Suppose f continuous and bounded by 1 in absolute value. It is clear that the integrals occurring in (3) exist for all x∈X. Let us show that they depend continuously on x. We can suppose μ≥0. Let x0∈X and ε>0. Let K be a compact subset of G such that ∫G−Kρ(s)dμ(s)≤ε. There exists a neighborhood V of x0 in X such that x∈V implies
∣f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x)−f(s−1x0)χ(s−1,x0)∣≤ε/μ(K)
for s∈K. Then, for x∈V,
∫f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x)dμ(s)−∫f(s−1x0)χ(s−1,x0)dμ(s)
≤2∫G−Kρ(s)dμ(s)+∫Kμ(K)εdμ(s)≤3ε,
whence our assertion. Suppose that in addition f∈K(X). Let H be a compact subset of X such that ∣f(y)∣≤ε for y∈/H. Let x∈/KH. Then s−1x∈/H for s∈K, therefore