Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 09KC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09KC].

Integration, VIII, p. 30, § 4. Convolution of measures and functions

Assume χ\chi a continuous multiplier and each function χ(s,⋅)\chi(s, \cdot) bounded. (i) The function s↦ρ(s)=sup⁡x∈Xχ(s−1,x)s \mapsto \rho(s) = \sup_{x \in X} \chi(s^{-1}, x) on GG is lower semi-continuous >0> 0 and satisfies ρ(st)≤ρ(s)ρ(t)\rho(st) \leq \rho(s)\rho(t) for all s,ts, t in GG. (ii) Let μ∈Mρ(G)\mu \in \mathscr{M}^\rho(G) and f∈L∞(X,β)f \in L^\infty(X, \beta).¹ Then μ\mu and ff are convolvable and μ∗βf\mu *^\beta f is given locally almost everywhere by the formula (3) of No. 1. One has μ∗βf∈L∞(X,β)\mu *^\beta f \in L^\infty(X, \beta), and ∥μ∗βf∥∞≤∥μ∥ρ∥f∥∞\| \mu *^\beta f \|_\infty \leq \| \mu \|_\rho \| f \|_\infty.

¹For a function ff, the expression "f∈L∞(X,β)f \in L^\infty(X, \beta)" is an abuse of notation signifying that, depending on the context, the symbol ff is to be interpreted either as a function or the equivalence class of a function. In particular, the symbol μ∗βf\mu *^\beta f can stand for either a function defined locally β\beta-almost everywhere, or the equivalence class of such a function for the relation of equality locally β\beta-almost everywhere.

(iii) *If, moreover, f∈C∞(X)f \in \mathscr{C}^\infty(X) (resp. K(X)‾\overline{\mathscr{K}(X)}), then formula (3) of No. 1 defines for every xx a convolution product μ∗βf\mu *^\beta f that belongs to C∞(X)\mathscr{C}^\infty(X) (resp. K(X)\mathscr{K}(X)).

(iv) *If f∈K(X)f \in \mathscr{K}(X), then the convolution product μ∗βf\mu *^\beta f defined by (3) is none other than the element γχ(μ)f\gamma_\chi(\mu)f defined by the continuous representation γχ\gamma_\chi of GG in K(X)‾\overline{\mathscr{K}(X)}.

The identity χ(st,x)=χ(s,tx)χ(t,x)\chi(st, x) = \chi(s, tx)\chi(t, x) implies at once that ρ(st)≤ρ(s)ρ(t)\rho(st) \leq \rho(s)\rho(t). On the other hand, ρ\rho is lower semi-continuous, being the upper envelope of continuous functions.

Let μ∈Mρ(G)\mu \in \mathscr{M}^\rho(G). By Prop. 1 of No. 1, μ\mu and 1 are convolvable; Prop. 2 (i) shows that (∣μ∣∗β1)(x)≤∫Gρ(s)d∣μ∣(s)(|\mu| *^\beta 1)(x) \leq \int_G \rho(s) d|\mu|(s) locally β\beta-almost everywhere. Therefore, if ff is β\beta-measurable and ∣f∣≤1|f| \leq 1, then μ\mu and ff are convolvable and N∞(μ∗βf)≤∫ρ(s)d∣μ∣(s)N_\infty(\mu *^\beta f) \leq \int \rho(s) d|\mu|(s). Moreover, μ∗βf\mu *^\beta f is given locally almost everywhere by formula (3) of No. 1, because condition (iii) of Prop. 2 of No. 1 is satisfied. This implies (ii).

Suppose ff continuous and bounded by 1 in absolute value. It is clear that the integrals occurring in (3) exist for all x∈Xx \in X. Let us show that they depend continuously on xx. We can suppose μ≥0\mu \geq 0. Let x0∈Xx_0 \in X and ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Let KK be a compact subset of GG such that ∫G−Kρ(s)dμ(s)≤ε\int_{G - K} \rho(s) d\mu(s) \leq \varepsilon. There exists a neighborhood VV of x0x_0 in XX such that x∈Vx \in V implies

∣f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x)−f(s−1x0)χ(s−1,x0)∣≤ε/μ(K) |f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x) - f(s^{-1}x_0)\chi(s^{-1}, x_0)| \leq \varepsilon / \mu(K)

for s∈Ks \in K. Then, for x∈Vx \in V,

∣∫f(s−1x)χ(s−1,x)dμ(s)−∫f(s−1x0)χ(s−1,x0)dμ(s)∣ \left| \int f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x) d\mu(s) - \int f(s^{-1}x_0)\chi(s^{-1}, x_0) d\mu(s) \right|
≤2∫G−Kρ(s)dμ(s)+∫Kεμ(K)dμ(s)≤3ε, \leq 2 \int_{G - K} \rho(s) d\mu(s) + \int_K \frac{\varepsilon}{\mu(K)} d\mu(s) \leq 3\varepsilon,

whence our assertion. Suppose that in addition f∈K(X)‾f \in \overline{\mathscr{K}(X)}. Let HH be a compact subset of XX such that ∣f(y)∣≤ε|f(y)| \leq \varepsilon for y∉Hy \notin H. Let x∉KHx \notin KH. Then s−1x∉Hs^{-1}x \notin H for s∈Ks \in K, therefore

∣∫Gf(s−1x)χ(s−1,x)dμ(s)∣≤∫G−Kρ(s)dμ(s)+∫Kερ(s)dμ(s) \left| \int_G f(s^{-1}x)\chi(s^{-1}, x) d\mu(s) \right| \leq \int_{G - K} \rho(s) d\mu(s) + \int_K \varepsilon \rho(s) d\mu(s)
≤ε(1+∫Gρ(s)dμ(s)), \leq \varepsilon \left( 1 + \int_G \rho(s) d\mu(s) \right),

which completes the proof of (iii).

Finally, if f∈K(X)f \in \mathscr{K}(X) then, since εx∈M1(X)\varepsilon_x \in \mathscr{M}^1(X) for all x∈Xx \in X, we have

(γχ(μ)f)(x)=∫(γχ(s)f)(x)dμ(s), (\gamma_\chi(\mu)f)(x) = \int (\gamma_\chi(s)f)(x) d\mu(s),

thus γχ(μ)f\gamma_\chi(\mu)f is the convolution product μ∗βf\mu *^\beta f defined by (3).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.