Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 09PX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09PX].

Integration, chapter IX, § 3. Measures and additive set functions

— Let T be a topological space, and let I be a function defined on B(T)\mathscr{B}(T), with values in R‾+\overline{\mathbf{R}}_+. In order that there exist a measure μ\mu on T such that μ∗(A)=I(A)\mu^*(A) = I(A) for every A∈B(T)A \in \mathscr{B}(T), it is necessary and sufficient that I be countably additive, locally bounded and inner regular. The measure μ\mu is then unique.

These three conditions are necessary: for, the mapping A↦μ∗(A)A \mapsto \mu^*(A) on B(T)\mathscr{B}(T) is countably additive (§ 1, No. 5, Cor. of Prop. 4), locally bounded by the definition of measures (§ 1, No. 2, Def. 5), and inner regular by Remark 3 of § 1, No. 2.

We pass to existence. It is clear that the restriction of I to K(T)\mathscr{K}(T) satisfies conditions 1), 2), 3) and 5) of the statement of Th. 1; let us show that 4) is satisfied as well. Let K be a compact subset of T, the intersection of a decreasing directed family (Kα)α∈A(K_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A} of compact sets, and let ε\varepsilon be a number >0> 0; I being locally bounded, there exists an open (hence Borel) neighborhood V of K such that I(V)<+∞I(V) < +\infty, and then there exists an index α\alpha such that Kα⊂VK_\alpha \subset V; changing notation if necessary, we can suppose that Kα⊂VK_\alpha \subset V for all α∈A\alpha \in A. By the inner regularity of I, there exists a compact set L⊂V−KL \subset V - K such that I(L)≥I(V−K)−εI(L) \geq I(V - K) - \varepsilon; since L does not intersect K, there exists an index α\alpha such that L∩Kα=∅L \cap K_\alpha = \varnothing, and one then has I(V−Kα)≥I(L)≥I(V−K)−εI(V - K_\alpha) \geq I(L) \geq I(V - K) - \varepsilon. Since Kα⊂VK_\alpha \subset V, it follows that I(Kα)≤I(K)+εI(K_\alpha) \leq I(K) + \varepsilon and the condition 4) is verified.

By Th. 1, there exists a measure μ\mu such that μ∙(K)=I(K)\mu^\bullet(K) = I(K) for all K∈K(T)K \in \mathscr{K}(T). The inner regularity of the set functions μ∙\mu^\bullet and II on B(T)\mathscr{B}(T) then implies that μ∙(A)=I(A)\mu^\bullet(A) = I(A) for all A∈B(T)A \in \mathscr{B}(T), and existence is proved. The uniqueness of μ\mu follows from the uniqueness assertion of Th. 1.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.