Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 09QW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09QW].

Integration, chapter IX, § 5. Measures on completely regular spaces

— Let T be a completely regular space. a) Let μ\mu be a positive measure on T, and f a numerical function ≥0\geq 0 defined on T and lower semi-continuous (resp. upper semi-continuous ous, finite, with compact support). Then

(1) μ∙(f)=sup⁡g∈Ifμ∙(g)\mu^\bullet(f) = \sup_{g \in I_f} \mu^\bullet(g) (resp. μ∙(f)=inf⁡g∈Sfμ(g)\mu^\bullet(f) = \inf_{g \in S_f} \mu(g)),

where IfI_f (resp. SfS_f) denotes the set of bounded continuous functions gg such that 0≤g≤f0 \leq g \leq f (resp. g≥fg \geq f).

b) Let θ\theta be a complex measure on TT, and ff a numerical function ≥0\geq 0 defined on TT and lower semi-continuous. Then

(2) ∣θ∣∙(f)=sup⁡g∣θ(g)∣|\theta|^\bullet(f) = \sup_g |\theta(g)|,

where gg runs over the set of bounded and ∣θ∣|\theta|-integrable continuous complex functions such that ∣g∣≤f|g| \leq f.

The first of the formulas (1) is obvious, because IfI_f is an increasing directed set of continuous functions whose upper envelope is ff, and one can apply Prop. 5 of §1, No. 6. The same proposition will imply the second formula, if we show that SfS_f contains a μ\mu-integrable bounded continuous function. Thus, let KK be the support of ff, and MM the supremum of ff; since KK is compact, MM is finite (GT, IV, §6, No. 2, Th. 3). Let UU be an open set containing KK and such that μ∙(U)<+∞\mu^\bullet(U) < +\infty; there exists (Lemma) a continuous function gg with values in [0,M][0, M], equal to MM on KK and zero outside UU; then g∈Sfg \in S_f and μ∙(g)≤Mμ∙(U)<+∞\mu^\bullet(g) \leq M \mu^\bullet(U) < +\infty.

Let us pass to b). It clearly suffices to show that ∣θ∣∙(f)≤sup⁡g∣θ(g)∣|\theta|^\bullet(f) \leq \sup_g |\theta(g)|.

Let aa and bb be two real numbers such that a<b<∣θ∣∙(f)a < b < |\theta|^\bullet(f). By (1), there exists a function h∈C+b(T)h \in \mathscr{C}_+^b(T) such that h≤fh \leq f and ∣θ∣∙(h)>b|\theta|^\bullet(h) > b; denote by MM the supremum of hh. By the definition of ∣θ∣∙|\theta|^\bullet (§1, No. 2, Def. 4), there exists a compact subset KK of TT such that ∣θ∣K∙(hK)>b|\theta|_K^\bullet(h_K) > b. There then exists a continuous complex function jj on KK such that ∣j∣≤hK|j| \leq h_K and ∣θK(j)∣>b|\theta_K(j)| > b (Ch. III, §1, No. 6). Let us choose an open set UU containing KK and such that ∣θ∣∙(U−K)≤b−aM|\theta|^\bullet(U - K) \leq \frac{b - a}{M} (§1, No. 9, Props. 13 and 14); extend jj to a continuous complex function kk on TT, zero outside UU (Lemma); for every t∈Tt \in T, set

(3)

g(t)={k(t)if ∣k(t)∣≤h(t)k(t)∣k(t)∣h(t)if ∣k(t)∣>h(t) g(t) = \begin{cases} k(t) & \text{if } |k(t)| \leq h(t) \\ \frac{k(t)}{|k(t)|} h(t) & \text{if } |k(t)| > h(t) \end{cases}

Clearly ∣g∣≤h≤f|g| \leq h \leq f, and g=jg = j on KK, therefore ∣∣θK(j)∣−∣θ(g)∣∣=∣∣θ(j0)∣−∣θ(g)∣∣≤∣θ∣∙(∣j0−g∣)≤M⋅∣θ∣∙(U−K)≤b−a||\theta_K(j)| - |\theta(g)|| = ||\theta(j^0)| - |\theta(g)|| \leq |\theta|^\bullet(|j^0 - g|) \leq M \cdot |\theta|^\bullet(U - K) \leq b - a, consequently ∣θ(g)∣>a|\theta(g)| > a. Let us show on the other hand that gg is a continuous function:

since aa is subject to the sole condition a<∣θ∣∗(f)a < |\theta|^*(f), this will imply that the second member of (2) is ⩾\geqslant the first, whence the proposition. Now, let F (resp. F′F') be the set of t∈Tt \in T such that ∣k(t)∣≤h(t)|k(t)| \leq h(t) (resp. ∣k(t)∣≥h(t)|k(t)| \geq h(t)). These sets being closed, and their union being T, it will suffice to show that gFg_F and gF′g_{F'} are continuous: now, this property is obvious for gF=kFg_F = k_F, and it is so for gF′g_{F'} at the points where k(t)≠0k(t) \neq 0; on the other hand, if t∈F′t \in F' is such that k(t)=0k(t) = 0, then also h(t)=0h(t) = 0, and the inequality ∣g∣≤h|g| \leq h implies that gg is continuous at the point tt.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.