Proposition 1
Tag 09QW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09QW].
Integration, chapter IX, § 5. Measures on completely regular spaces
— Let T be a completely regular space. a) Let be a positive measure on T, and f a numerical function defined on T and lower semi-continuous (resp. upper semi-continuous ous, finite, with compact support). Then
(1) (resp. ),
where (resp. ) denotes the set of bounded continuous functions such that (resp. ).
b) Let be a complex measure on , and a numerical function defined on and lower semi-continuous. Then
(2) ,
where runs over the set of bounded and -integrable continuous complex functions such that .
The first of the formulas (1) is obvious, because is an increasing directed set of continuous functions whose upper envelope is , and one can apply Prop. 5 of §1, No. 6. The same proposition will imply the second formula, if we show that contains a -integrable bounded continuous function. Thus, let be the support of , and the supremum of ; since is compact, is finite (GT, IV, §6, No. 2, Th. 3). Let be an open set containing and such that ; there exists (Lemma) a continuous function with values in , equal to on and zero outside ; then and .
Let us pass to b). It clearly suffices to show that .
Let and be two real numbers such that . By (1), there exists a function such that and ; denote by the supremum of . By the definition of (§1, No. 2, Def. 4), there exists a compact subset of such that . There then exists a continuous complex function on such that and (Ch. III, §1, No. 6). Let us choose an open set containing and such that (§1, No. 9, Props. 13 and 14); extend to a continuous complex function on , zero outside (Lemma); for every , set
(3)
Clearly , and on , therefore , consequently . Let us show on the other hand that is a continuous function:
since is subject to the sole condition , this will imply that the second member of (2) is the first, whence the proposition. Now, let F (resp. ) be the set of such that (resp. ). These sets being closed, and their union being T, it will suffice to show that and are continuous: now, this property is obvious for , and it is so for at the points where ; on the other hand, if is such that , then also , and the inequality implies that is continuous at the point .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.