Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 09SF, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09SF].

Integration, chapter IX, § 6. Promeasures and measures on a locally convex space

— 1) Let EE be a finite-dimensional vector space, and let μ\mu be a positive measure on EE of mass 1, such that every linear form on EE belongs to L2(E,μ)\mathscr{L}^2(E, \mu). One defines an element mm of EE and a positive quadratic form VV on E′E' by the formulas

⟨m,x′⟩=∫E⟨x,x′⟩dμ(x),V(x′)=∫E⟨x−m,x′⟩2dμ(x). \langle m, x' \rangle = \int_E \langle x, x' \rangle d\mu(x), \quad V(x') = \int_E \langle x - m, x' \rangle^2 d\mu(x).
In the traditional terminology of Probability Theory, mm is called the mean and VV the variance of μ\mu; μ\mu is said to be centered if m=0m = 0.

Now let aa be an element of EE and QQ a positive quadratic form on E′E'. Let us denote by Γa,Q\Gamma_{a,Q} the image of the measure ΓQ\Gamma_Q under the translation x↦x+ax \mapsto x + a. It is easily seen that Γa,Q\Gamma_{a,Q} is a positive measure on EE of mass 1, with Fourier transform x′↦ei⟨a,x′⟩−12Q(x′)x' \mapsto e^{i\langle a, x' \rangle - \frac{1}{2} Q(x')} and mean aa. Moreover, Prop. 6 below implies that QQ is the variance of Γa,Q\Gamma_{a,Q}. One traditionally says that Γa,Q\Gamma_{a,Q} is the Gaussian measure with mean aa and variance QQ, and that ΓQ=Γ0,Q\Gamma_Q = \Gamma_{0,Q} is the centered Gaussian measure with variance QQ. Since we shall only be considering centered Gaussian measures, we shall omit this qualifier.

2) Let QQ be a quadratic form on the dual E′E' of a locally convex space EE. If there exists a promeasure on EE with Fourier transform e−Q/2e^{-Q/2}, the quadratic form QQ is necessarily positive: for, the function e−Q/2e^{-Q/2} is bounded on E′E'; therefore, for every x′∈E′x' \in E', the function t↦e−t2Q(x′)/2=e−Q(tx′)/2t \mapsto e^{-t^2 Q(x')/2} = e^{-Q(tx')/2} on R\mathbf{R} is bounded, whence Q(x′)≥0Q(x') \geq 0.

3) The dual of R\mathbf{R} is canonically isomorphic to R\mathbf{R} and the positive quadratic forms on R\mathbf{R} are the functions of the form t↦at2t \mapsto at^2 with a≥0a \geq 0. Therefore, there exists for every a≥0a \geq 0 one and only bounded measure γa\gamma_a on R\mathbf{R} whose Fourier transform is equal to the function t↦e−at2/2t \mapsto e^{-at^2/2}; by an abuse of language, γa\gamma_a is said to be the Gaussian measure on R\mathbf{R} with variance aa.

The Fourier transform of γ0\gamma_0 is the constant 1, whence γ0=ε0\gamma_0 = \varepsilon_0 (unit mass at the origin of R\mathbf{R}). Suppose a>0a > 0 and denote by uau_a the linear mapping x↦a1/2xx \mapsto a^{1/2} x; then Fγa=Fγ1∘tua\mathscr{F}\gamma_a = \mathscr{F}\gamma_1 \circ {}^t u_a, whence γa=ua(γ1)\gamma_a = u_a(\gamma_1). Lemma 2 shows that γ1\gamma_1 is the measure with density x↦(2π)−1/2e−x2/2x \mapsto (2\pi)^{-1/2} e^{-x^2/2} with respect to Lebesgue measure; from this, one easily deduces

(15)dγa(x)=(2πa)−1/2e−x2/2adx. (15) \quad d\gamma_a(x) = (2\pi a)^{-1/2} e^{-x^2/2a} dx .

The image of a Gaussian promeasure under a continuous linear mapping is a Gaussian promeasure. More precisely, we have the following result:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.