Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 09SI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09SI].

Integration, IX, p. 81, § 6. Promeasures and measures on a locally convex space

Let E be a locally convex space, and μ\mu a Gaussian measure on E, with variance Q. For every integer n≥0n \geq 0 and every x′∈E′x' \in E', one has the relations

(16)∫E∣⟨x,x′⟩∣ndμ(x)=π−1/22n/2Γ(n+12)Q(x′)n/2(17)∫E⟨x,x′⟩2ndμ(x)=(2n)!2nn!Q(x′)n(18)∫E⟨x,x′⟩2n+1dμ(x)=0. \begin{align*} (16) & \quad \int_E |\langle x, x' \rangle|^n d\mu(x) = \pi^{-1/2} 2^{n/2} \Gamma\left( \frac{n+1}{2} \right) Q(x')^{n/2} \\ (17) & \quad \int_E \langle x, x' \rangle^{2n} d\mu(x) = \frac{(2n)!}{2^n n!} Q(x')^n \\ (18) & \quad \int_E \langle x, x' \rangle^{2n+1} d\mu(x) = 0 . \end{align*}

In particular,

(19)∫E⟨x,x′⟩2dμ(x)=Q(x′)(x′∈E′). (19) \quad \int_E \langle x, x' \rangle^2 d\mu(x) = Q(x') \qquad (x' \in E') .

If these formulas are true for an element x′x' of E′E', then they are true for all of its multiples t⋅x′t \cdot x' (with tt real). We may therefore content ourselves with establishing them when Q(x′)Q(x') is equal to 0 or 1.

a) Suppose Q(x′)=0Q(x') = 0. The measure x′(μ)x'(\mu) is equal to γ0=ε0\gamma_0 = \varepsilon_0, therefore x′x' is zero μ\mu-almost everywhere; the formulas (16) to (19) are then obvious.

b) Suppose Q(x′)=1Q(x') = 1, whence x′(μ)=γ1x'(\mu) = \gamma_1. Then

∫E∣⟨x,x′⟩∣ndμ(x)=∫R∣t∣ndγ1(t)=(2π)−1/2∫R∣t∣ne−t2/2dt \int_E |\langle x, x' \rangle|^n d\mu(x) = \int_{\mathbf{R}} |t|^n d\gamma_1(t) = (2\pi)^{-1/2} \int_{\mathbf{R}} |t|^n e^{-t^2/2} dt
and (16) follows immediately from (6) (No 4, Lemma 1). Similarly, formulas (17) and (18) follow from (7) and (8). Finally, (19) is obtained by setting n=1n = 1 in (17).

We can now prove a converse of the Cor. of Prop. 5.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.