Let E be a locally convex space, and μ a Gaussian measure on E, with variance Q. For every integer n≥0 and every x′∈E′, one has the relations
(16)(17)(18)∫E∣⟨x,x′⟩∣ndμ(x)=π−1/22n/2Γ(2n+1)Q(x′)n/2∫E⟨x,x′⟩2ndμ(x)=2nn!(2n)!Q(x′)n∫E⟨x,x′⟩2n+1dμ(x)=0.
In particular,
(19)∫E⟨x,x′⟩2dμ(x)=Q(x′)(x′∈E′).
If these formulas are true for an element x′ of E′, then they are true for all of its multiples t⋅x′ (with t real). We may therefore content ourselves with establishing them when Q(x′) is equal to 0 or 1.
a) Suppose Q(x′)=0. The measure x′(μ) is equal to γ0=ε0, therefore x′ is zero μ-almost everywhere; the formulas (16) to (19) are then obvious.
b) Suppose Q(x′)=1, whence x′(μ)=γ1. Then
∫E∣⟨x,x′⟩∣ndμ(x)=∫R∣t∣ndγ1(t)=(2π)−1/2∫R∣t∣ne−t2/2dt and (16) follows immediately from (6) (No 4, Lemma 1). Similarly, formulas (17) and (18) follow from (7) and (8). Finally, (19) is obtained by setting
n=1 in (17).
We can now prove a converse of the Cor. of Prop. 5.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.