Bourbaki

Example 1

Tag 09W0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 09W0].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter I, § 3. Representations

Let gg be a Lie algebra over KK and MM a gg-module. The gg-module structure on MM and the trivial gg-module structure on KK define a gg-module structure on the KK-module N=L(M,M;K)N = \mathscr{L}(M, M; K) of bilinear forms on MM. Then

(xN⋅β)(m,m′)=−β(xM⋅m,m′)+β(m,xM⋅m′) (x_N \cdot \beta)(m, m') = -\beta(x_M \cdot m, m') + \beta(m, x_M \cdot m')

for all x∈g,m,m′x \in g, m, m' in M,β∈NM, \beta \in N. If β\beta is a given element of NN, the set of x∈gx \in g such that xN⋅β=0x_N \cdot \beta = 0 is a subalgebra of gg.

Let MM be a KK-module and β\beta a bilinear form on MM. By the above, the set of x∈gl(M)x \in gl(M) such that

β(x⋅m,m′)+β(m,x⋅m′)=0 \beta(x \cdot m, m') + \beta(m, x \cdot m') = 0

for all m∈Mm \in M and m′∈Mm' \in M is a Lie subalgebra of gl(M)gl(M). Suppose that KK is a field, MM is finite-dimensional and β\beta is non-degenerate. Then every x∈gl(M)x \in gl(M) admits a left adjoint x∗x^* (relative to β\beta) which is everywhere defined and the subalgebra in question is the set of x∈gl(M)x \in gl(M) such that x∗=−xx^* = -x. By this process we can construct two important examples of Lie algebras:

(a) Take M=KnM = K^n and

β((ξ1,…,ξn),(η1,…,ηn))=ξ1η1+⋯+ξnηn. \beta((\xi_1, \ldots, \xi_n), (\eta_1, \ldots, \eta_n)) = \xi_1 \eta_1 + \cdots + \xi_n \eta_n.

We canonically identify gl(Kn)gl(K^n) with Mn(K)M_n(K). Then the Lie algebra obtained is the Lie algebra of skew-symmetric matrices. (When K=RK = \mathbf{R}, this algebra is the Lie algebra of the orthogonal group O(n,R)O(n, \mathbf{R})).

(b) Take M=K2mM = K^{2m} and

β((ξ1,…,ξ2m),(η1,…,η2m))=ξ1ηm+1−η1ξm+1+⋯+ξmη2m−ηmξ2m. \beta((\xi_1, \ldots, \xi_{2m}), (\eta_1, \ldots, \eta_{2m})) = \xi_1 \eta_{m+1} - \eta_1 \xi_{m+1} + \cdots + \xi_m \eta_{2m} - \eta_m \xi_{2m}.
The matrix of β\beta with respect to the canonical basis of K2mK^{2m} is the matrix
(0Im−Im0). \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_m \\ -I_m & 0 \end{pmatrix}.
Let U=(ABCD)U = \begin{pmatrix} A & B \\ C & D \end{pmatrix} be the matrix with respect to the canonical basis of K2mK^{2m} of an element uu of gl(M)\mathrm{gl}(M) (A,B,C,DA, B, C, D lying in Mm(K)\mathbf{M}_m(K)). By formula (50) of Algebra, Chapter IX, § 1, no. 10, u∗u^* has with respect to the same basis the matrix
(0−ImIm0)(tAtCtBtD)(0Im−Im0)=(tD−tB−tCtA). \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -I_m \\ I_m & 0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} tA & tC \\ tB & tD \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_m \\ -I_m & 0 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} tD & -tB \\ -tC & tA \end{pmatrix}.
The condition u∗=−uu^* = -u is therefore equivalent to the conditions
D=−tAB=tBC=tC. D = -tA \quad B = tB \quad C = tC.
When K=RK = \mathbf{R}, the Lie algebra obtained is the Lie algebra of the symplectic group Sp(2m,R)\mathbf{Sp}(2m, \mathbf{R}).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • *Algebra*, Chapter IX, § 1, no. 10 not yet on this site: A IX
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.