Let X be a set, S a subset of X and T the set of sequences (s1,…,sn,x) with n≥0,s1,…,sn in S and x in X −S.†
(a) The module L(X) is the direct sum of the subalgebra L(S) of L(X) and the ideal a of L(X) generated by X−S.
(b) There exists a Lie algebra isomorphism ϕ of L(T) onto a which maps (s1,…,sn,x) to (ads1∘⋯∘adsn)(x).
Let g be the Lie algebra constructed as in Proposition 9 given
S1=S,S2=T,d(s,t)=(s,s1,…,sn,x)∈T⊂L(T)
for t=(s1,…,sn,x) in T and s∈S1. We identify L(S) and L(T) with their canonical images in g (Proposition 9 (a)).
Let ψ be the mapping (s1,…,sn,x)↦(ads1∘⋯∘adsn)(x) of T into L(X). Obviously ψ(d(s,t))=[s,ψ(t)] for s∈S and t∈T and hence there exists a homomorphism α:g→L(X) whose restriction to S is the identity and whose restriction to T is ψ. Now X−S⊂T, whence there is a homomorphism β:L(X)→g whose restriction to X=S∪(X−S) is the identity.
We show that α is an isomorphism and β the inverse isomorphism. As ψ(x)=x for x in X−S, we see that α∘β coincides with the identity on X, whence α∘β=IdL(X). On the other hand, [s,t]=d(s,t) in g for s∈S,t∈T by construction; it follows that t=(s1,…,sn,x) is equal in g to (ads1∘⋯∘ads2)(x) whence t=β(α(t)). As β(α(s))=s for s∈S and S∪T generates g, β∘α=Idg.
As α is an isomorphism of g onto L(X), Proposition 9 shows that the restric-
† For n=0, we obtain the elements of X−S, whence X−S⊂T.
tion of α to L(T) is an isomorphism ϕ of L(T) onto an ideal b of L(X) such that the module L(X) is the direct sum of L(S) and b. Obviously
ϕ(s1,…,sn,x)=(ad s1∘⋯∘ad sn)(x) for
(s1,…,sn,x) in
T.
Hence ϕ(T)⊂a, whereas b⊂a since ϕ(T) generates the subalgebra b of L(X). But b is an ideal and X−S⊂ϕ(T)⊂b, whence a⊂b.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.