Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0A3I, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A3I].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter II, § 2. Free Lie algebras

For every integer p≥0p \geq 0, the module LpL_p admits the family (wˉi)0≤i<p(\bar{w}_i)_{0 \leq i < p} as basis, the Lie algebra gpg_p admits (uˉ)u∈Pp(\bar{u})_{u \in P_p} as basic family and the module L(X)L(X) is the direct sum of LpL_p and gpg_p.

L0={0}L_0 = \{0\} and g0=L(X)g_0 = L(X) and the lemma is true for p=0p = 0. We argue by induction on pp. Suppose then that the lemma is true for some integer p≥0p \geq 0. Let ui,w=(ad wˉp)i.wˉ=Ψ(wpiw)u_i, w = (\mathrm{ad}\ \bar{w}_p)^i.\bar{w} = \Psi(w_p^i w) for i≥0,w∈Pp,w≠wpi \geq 0, w \in P_p, w \neq w_p. By the Corollary to Proposition 10 of no. 9, the free Lie algebra gpg_p is the direct sum of the module TpT_p of basis {wˉp}\{\bar{w}_p\} and a Lie subalgebra hph_p admitting

F=(ui,w)i≥0, w∈Pp, w≠wp \mathscr{F} = (u_i, w)_{i \geq 0,\ w \in P_p,\ w \neq w_p}

as basic family. By Proposition 13 (d), the family (uˉ)u∈Pp+1(\bar{u})_{u \in P_{p+1}} is equal to F\mathscr{F} and hence is a basic family of hp=gp+1h_p = g_{p+1}. Hence L(X)=Lp⊕Tp⊕gp+1L(X) = L_p \oplus T_p \oplus g_{p+1} and, as Lp+1=Lp+TpL_{p+1} = L_p + T_p, L(X)=Lp+1⊕gp+1L(X) = L_{p+1} \oplus g_{p+1} and (wˉ0,wˉ1,…,wˉp−1,wˉp)(\bar{w}_0, \bar{w}_1, \ldots, \bar{w}_{p-1}, \bar{w}_p) is a basis of the module Lp+1L_{p+1}.

Let nn be a positive integer. By Proposition 13 (c) there exists an integer p(n)p(n) such that PpP_p has only elements of length >n> n for p≥p(n)p \geq p(n). For p≥p(n)p \geq p(n), the Lie subalgebra gpg_p of L(X)L(X) is generated by elements of degree >n> n and hence Ln(X)∩gp={0}L^n(X) \cap g_p = \{0\}. On the other hand, the elements wˉi\bar{w}_i of L(X)L(X) are homogeneous and the family (wi)0≤i<p(w_i)_{0 \leq i < p} is a basis of a supplementary module of gpg_p. It follows immediately that the family of elements wˉi\bar{w}_i of degree nn is a basis of the module Ln(X)L^n(X) and that the sequence (wˉi)i≥0(\bar{w}_i)_{i \geq 0} is a basis of the module L(X)L(X).

(B) General case.

If SS is a subset of XX, recall that M(S)M(S) is identified with the submagna of M(X)M(X) generated by SS and L(S)L(S) is identified with the Lie subalgebra of L(X)L(X) generated by SS; we have seen that if w∈M(S)w \in M(S) is of length ≥2\geq 2 then α(w)∈M(S)\alpha(w) \in M(S) and β(w)∈M(S)\beta(w) \in M(S). It follows immediately that H∩M(S)H \cap M(S) is a Hall set relative to SS.

For every finite subset Φ\Phi of HH there exists a finite subset SS of XX such that

Φ ⊂ M(S). Case (A) then shows that the elements wˉ\bar{w} with w∈Φw \in \Phi are linearly independent in L(S)L(S) and hence in L(X)L(X). Therefore the family (wˉ)w∈H(\bar{w})_{w \in H} is free.

For every element aa of L(X)L(X) there exists a finite subset SS of XX such that a∈L(S)a \in L(S). By case (A), the subset Ψ′(H∩M(S))\Psi'(H \cap M(S)) of Ψ′(H)\Psi'(H) generates the module L(S)L(S) and hence aa is a linear combination of elements of Ψ′(H)\Psi'(H). Hence Ψ′(H)\Psi'(H) generates the module L(X)L(X), which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.