Let X be a normal space and (Xi)i∈I a locally finite open covering of X. For all (i,j)∈I×I and all x∈Xi∩Xj, let Vij(x) be a neighbourhood of x contained in Xi∩Xj. Then we can associate with every x∈X a neighbourhood V(x) of x such that the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the relation x∈Xi∩Xj implies V(x)⊂Vij(x); (b) if V(x) and V(y) meet, there exists i∈I such that V(x)∪V(y)⊂Xi. There exists an open covering (Xi′)i∈I of X such that Xi′⊂Xi for all i∈I (General Topology, Chapter IX, § 4, Theorem 3). Let x∈X. Let V1(x) be the intersection of the Vij(x) and the Xk′ which contain x; this is an open neighbourhood of x. Let V2(x) be a neighbourhood of x contained in V1(x) and meeting only a finite number of Xi. Then V2(x) meets only a finite number of Xi′ and hence the set
V(x)=V2(x)∩i∈I,x∈/Xi′⋂(X−Xi′)
is a neighbourhood of x. If x∈Xi∩Xj, then V1(x)⊂Xi∩Xj and hence V(x)⊂Xi∩Xj. Let x,y be in X and suppose that V(x) and V(y) meet. There exists i∈I such that x∈Xi′. Then V1(x)⊂Xi′, hence V(x)⊂Xi′ and hence V(y)∩Xi′=∅. Then y∈Xi′ by definition of V(y), whence y∈Xi and V(y)⊂Xi. Thus Xi contains V(x) and V(y).
§ 2.1
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.