Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0A9B, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0A9B].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 3. Passage from a Lie group to its Lie algebra

If t \in \mathscr{T}^{(\infty)}(G) and g \in G, then γ(g)∗t=εg∗t,δ(g)∗t=t∗εg−1\gamma(g)_* t = \varepsilon_g * t, \delta(g)_* t = t * \varepsilon_{g^{-1}}, (Int g)_* t = εg∗t∗εg−1\varepsilon_g * t * \varepsilon_{g^{-1}}. In particular, εe\varepsilon_e is the unit element of \mathscr{T}^{(\infty)}(G).

Consider the diagram

G→ϕG×G→ψG \begin{array}{ccccc} G & \xrightarrow{\phi} & G \times G & \xrightarrow{\psi} & G \\ \end{array}

where ϕ\phi is the mapping h↦(g,h)h \mapsto (g, h) and ψ\psi is the mapping (h′,h)↦h′h(h', h) \mapsto h'h. Then γ(g)=ψ∘ϕ\gamma(g) = \psi \circ \phi and hence γ(g)∗t=ψ∗(ϕ∗(t))\gamma(g)_* t = \psi_*(\phi_*(t)). But ϕ∗(t)=εg⊗t\phi_*(t) = \varepsilon_g \otimes t and hence ψ∗(ϕ∗(t))=εg∗t\psi_*(\phi_*(t)) = \varepsilon_g * t. The argument is similar for δ(g)∗t\delta(g)_* t. Finally,

Int⁡g=γ(g)∘δ(g) \operatorname{Int} g = \gamma(g) \circ \delta(g)

and hence (Int⁡g)∗=γ(g)∗∘δ(g)∗(\operatorname{Int} g)_* = \gamma(g)_* \circ \delta(g)_*.

It is therefore seen that, for t∈T(G)t \in T(G), εg∗t\varepsilon_g * t and t∗εgt * \varepsilon_g are equal to gtgt and tgtg calculated in the group T(G) (§ 2, no. 2). But it should be noted that, for t,t′t, t' in T(G), the product tt′tt' in the sense of § 2 is in general different from t∗t′t * t'.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.