Let G, G' be Lie groups, X a manifold of class Cr and (g,x)↦gx (resp. (x,g′)↦xg′) a law of left (resp. right) operation of class Cr of G (resp. G') on X. Suppose that (gx)g′=g(xg′) for all x∈X,g∈G,g′∈G′. Let t∈T(s)(G), t′∈T(s′)(G′) and f:X→F be a function of class Cr such that s+s′≤r. Then
(t∗f)∗t′=t∗(f∗t′). For all
x∈X,
⟨εx,(t∗f)∗t′⟩=⟨εx∗t′∨,t∗f⟩by (8)=⟨t∨∗(εx∗t′∨),f⟩(Proposition 17)=⟨t∨∗εx,f∗t′⟩(Proposition 2 and (11))=⟨εx,t∗(f∗t′)⟩by (5).
In particular, consider G as operating on itself by left and right translations. If f:G→F is a function of class Cr on G and t∈T(s)(G) (with s≤r), t∗f and f∗t are, if s<∞, functions of class Cr−s on G. Further, let t′∈T(s′)(G), with s+s′≤r. Then
(t∗f)∗t′=t∗(f∗t′). In particular,
C∞(G) is a
(T(∞)(G),T(∞)(G))-bimodule. Formulae (5) and (8) admit as special cases
⟨t,f⟩=⟨εe,t∨∗f⟩=⟨εe,f∗t∨⟩.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.