Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 0ADH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ADH].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups

Let MM be an analytic manifold of finite dimension nn. Let ω1,…,ωn\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_n be analytic differential forms of degree 1 on MM, with scalar values, which are linearly independent at each point of MM and such that, for all k=1,…,nk = 1, \ldots, n, dωkd\omega_k is a linear combination with constant coefficients of the ωi∧ωj\omega_i \wedge \omega_j. Then, for all m0∈Mm_0 \in M, there exists an open neighbourhood M′M' of m0m_0 in MM and a Lie group germ structure on M′M' compatible with the manifold structure on M′M', with identity element m0m_0 and such that ω1∣M′,…,ωn∣M′\omega_1|_{M'}, \ldots, \omega_n|_{M'} form a basis of the space of left invariant differential forms on M′M' of degree 1 with scalar values.

If M1′M'_1 and M2′M'_2 are two such group germs, M1′M'_1 and M2′M'_2 have a common open subgroup germ.

Let X1,…,XnX_1, \ldots, X_n be the vector fields on MM such that, at each point mm of MM, the (Xt)m(X_t)_m constitute the basis of Tm(M)T_m(M) dual to ((ω1)m,…,(ωn)m)((\omega_1)_m, \ldots, (\omega_n)_m). These fields are analytic. By hypothesis, there exist cijk∈Kc_{ijk} \in \mathbf{K} (1≤i,j,k≤n1 \leq i, j, k \leq n) such that cijk=−cjikc_{ijk} = -c_{jik} and dωk=∑i<jcijkωi∧ωjd\omega_k = \sum_{i < j} c_{ijk} \omega_i \wedge \omega_j. By Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 8.5.7, formula (11),

⟨[Xi,Xj],ωk⟩=−(dωk)(Xi,Xj)=−(∑r<scrskωr∧ωs)(Xi,Xj)=−cijk \langle [X_i, X_j], \omega_k \rangle = -(d\omega_k)(X_i, X_j) = -\left( \sum_{r < s} c_{rsk} \omega_r \wedge \omega_s \right)(X_i, X_j) = -c_{ijk}
and hence [Xi,Xj]=−∑kcijkXk[X_i, X_j] = -\sum_k c_{ijk} X_k. It then follows that the −cijk-c_{ijk} are the constants of structure of a Lie algebra gg relative to a basis (e1,…,en)(e_1, \ldots, e_n). For all m∈Mm \in M, let αm\alpha_m be the linear mapping of Tm(M)T_m(M) into gg which maps (X1)m(X_1)_m to e1,…,(Xn)me_1, \ldots, (X_n)_m to ene_n. Then α\alpha is an analytic differential form on MM of degree 1 with values in gg and αm\alpha_m is an isomorphism of Tm(M)T_m(M) onto gg. On the other hand, α=∑k=1nωkek\alpha = \sum_{k=1}^n \omega_k e_k and hence
dα=∑k=1n(dωk)ek=∑k=1n(∑i<jcijkωi∧ωj)ek d\alpha = \sum_{k=1}^n (d\omega_k)e_k = \sum_{k=1}^n \left( \sum_{i<j} c_{ijk}\omega_i \wedge \omega_j \right)e_k
and
[α]2=∑k=1n[ωkek]2+∑i<j(ωiei)∧(ωjej)(§3,formula (30))=∑i<j(ωi∧ωj)[ei,ej]=−∑k=1n∑i<j(cijkωi∧ωj)ek=−dα. \begin{align*} [\alpha]^2 &= \sum_{k=1}^n [\omega_k e_k]^2 + \sum_{i<j} (\omega_i e_i) \wedge (\omega_j e_j) \quad (§ 3, \text{formula (30)}) \\ &= \sum_{i<j} (\omega_i \wedge \omega_j)[e_i, e_j] \\ &= -\sum_{k=1}^n \sum_{i<j} (c_{ijk}\omega_i \wedge \omega_j)e_k \\ &= -d\alpha. \end{align*}
It then suffices to apply Proposition 10.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.