Proposition 10
Tag 0ADG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ADG].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups
Let M be an analytic manifold, a complete normable Lie algebra and an analytic differential form of degree 1 on M, with values in , with the following properties: (a) for all , is an isomorphism of onto ; (b) .
Then, for all , there exist an open neighbourhood of in M and a Lie group germ structure on , compatible with the manifold structure on , with identity element and with the following properties: (i) is an isomorphism of onto ; (ii) the differential form is the left canonical differential form of . If and are two such group germs, and have a common open subgroup germ.
There exists a Lie group germ G such that . Let . By Theorem 5, there exist an open neighbourhood of in M and an analytic mapping of into G such that and . Then is an isomorphism of onto ; hence, shrinking and G, it can be assumed that is an isomorphism of the manifold onto the manifold G. We transport to the Lie group germ structure on G by means of . Then becomes an isomorphism of onto , whence (i). On the other hand, if denotes the left canonical differential form of , then
Let be an open neighbourhood of , with a Lie group germ structure, with identity element and with the analogous properties to properties (i) and (ii). Then is an isomorphism of onto and also of onto and hence . Therefore, shrinking and , it can be assumed that there exists an isomorphism of the group germ onto the group germ (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Theorem 1). Then is the canonical left differential of . On the other hand, let be the canonical injection of the manifold into the Lie group germ ; clearly is a restriction of the canonical left differential of . Hence for all . Therefore and coincide on a neighbourhood of (§ 3, 18.9). This proves the last assertion of the proposition.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.