Let G and H be Lie group germs and f a continuous morphism of L(G) into L(H). (i) There exist an open Lie subgroup germ G′ of G and a morphism ϕ of G′ into H such that f=L(ϕ). (ii) Let G1,G2 be open Lie subgroup germs of G and ϕi a morphism of Gi into H such that f=L(ϕi) for i=1,2. Then ϕ1 and ϕ2 coincide on a neighbourhood of e. Let p1:G×H→G,p2:G×H→H be the canonical projections. For all (g,h)∈G×H, let fg,h be the mapping ga↦hf(a) of Tg(G)=gL(G) into Th(H)=hL(H). By considering the left trivializations of T(G) and T(H), it is seen immediately that the fg,h define a morphism of p1∗T(G) into p2∗T(H). Let a be the graph of f; it is a closed Lie subalgebra of L(G)×L(H) which admits {0}×L(H) as topological supplement. For all (g,h)∈G×H, the graph of fg,h is (g,h)⋅a. The union of these graphs is an integrable vector subbundle of T(G×H) (Lemma 1). Then there exist (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7) an open neighbourhood U of eG in G and an analytic mapping ϕ of U into H such that ϕ(eG)=eH and Tg(ϕ)=fg,ϕ(g) for all g∈U. In particular, TeG(ϕ)=f.
Let V be an open neighbourhood of eG in G such that, for (s,t)∈V×V, the products st and ϕ(s)ϕ(t) are defined and st∈U. Consider the mappings α1,α2 of V×V into H defined by
α1(s,t)=ϕ(ts),α2(s,t)=ϕ(t)ϕ(s).
Then α1(t,e)=ϕ(t)=α2(t,e). On the other hand, let t be fixed in V and βi be the mapping s↦αi(s,t) of V into H. Then, for all s∈V and all a∈L(G),
Ts(β1)(sa)Ts(β2)(sa)=Tts(ϕ)(tsa)=fts,ϕ(ts)(tsa)=ϕ(ts)f(a)=fs,β1(s)(sa)=ϕ(t)Ts(ϕ)(sa)=ϕ(t)fs,ϕ(s)(sa)=ϕ(t)ϕ(s)f(a)=fs,β2(s)(sa).
Hence (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7) α1 and α2 coincide on a neighbourhood of (eG,eG). The restriction of ϕ to a sufficiently small symmetric open neighbourhood of eG is therefore a morphism of Lie group germs, whence (i).
Let G1,G2,ϕ1,ϕ2 be as in (ii) and let us prove that ϕ1,ϕ2 coincide on a neighbourhood of eG. There exists an open neighbourhood W of eG such that ϕ1(ts)=ϕ1(t)ϕ1(s), ϕ2(ts)=ϕ2(t)ϕ2(s) for all s,t in W. Then, if s∈W and a∈L(G),
Ts(ϕi)(sa)=ϕi(s)Te(ϕi)(a)=ϕi(s)f(a)=fs,ϕi(s)(sa)
for i=1,2. As ϕ1(eG)=eH=ϕ2(eG), it follows from Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7 that ϕ1 and ϕ2 coincide on a neighbourhood of eG.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.