Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0ACL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ACL].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups

Let G and H be Lie group germs and f a continuous morphism of L(G)L(G) into L(H)L(H). (i) There exist an open Lie subgroup germ G′G' of G and a morphism ϕ\phi of G′G' into H such that f=L(ϕ)f = L(\phi). (ii) Let G1,G2G_1, G_2 be open Lie subgroup germs of G and ϕi\phi_i a morphism of GiG_i into H such that f=L(ϕi)f = L(\phi_i) for i=1,2i = 1, 2. Then ϕ1\phi_1 and ϕ2\phi_2 coincide on a neighbourhood of e. Let p1:G×H→G,p2:G×H→Hp_1 : G \times H \to G, p_2 : G \times H \to H be the canonical projections. For all (g,h)∈G×H(g, h) \in G \times H, let fg,hf_{g, h} be the mapping ga↦hf(a)ga \mapsto hf(a) of Tg(G)=gL(G)T_g(G) = gL(G) into Th(H)=hL(H)T_h(H) = hL(H). By considering the left trivializations of T(G)T(G) and T(H)T(H), it is seen immediately that the fg,hf_{g, h} define a morphism of p1∗T(G)p_1^*T(G) into p2∗T(H)p_2^*T(H). Let aa be the graph of ff; it is a closed Lie subalgebra of L(G)×L(H)L(G) \times L(H) which admits {0}×L(H)\{0\} \times L(H) as topological supplement. For all (g,h)∈G×H(g, h) \in G \times H, the graph of fg,hf_{g,h} is (g,h)⋅a(g, h) \cdot a. The union of these graphs is an integrable vector subbundle of T(G×H)T(G \times H) (Lemma 1). Then there exist (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7) an open neighbourhood UU of eGe_G in GG and an analytic mapping ϕ\phi of UU into HH such that ϕ(eG)=eH\phi(e_G) = e_H and Tg(ϕ)=fg,ϕ(g)T_g(\phi) = f_{g, \phi(g)} for all g∈Ug \in U. In particular, TeG(ϕ)=fT_{e_G}(\phi) = f.

Let VV be an open neighbourhood of eGe_G in GG such that, for (s,t)∈V×V(s, t) \in V \times V, the products stst and ϕ(s)ϕ(t)\phi(s)\phi(t) are defined and st∈Ust \in U. Consider the mappings α1,α2\alpha_1, \alpha_2 of V×VV \times V into HH defined by

α1(s,t)=ϕ(ts),α2(s,t)=ϕ(t)ϕ(s). \alpha_1(s, t) = \phi(ts), \quad \alpha_2(s, t) = \phi(t)\phi(s).

Then α1(t,e)=ϕ(t)=α2(t,e)\alpha_1(t, e) = \phi(t) = \alpha_2(t, e). On the other hand, let tt be fixed in VV and βi\beta_i be the mapping s↦αi(s,t)s \mapsto \alpha_i(s, t) of VV into HH. Then, for all s∈Vs \in V and all a∈L(G)a \in L(G),

Ts(β1)(sa)=Tts(ϕ)(tsa)=fts,ϕ(ts)(tsa)=ϕ(ts)f(a)=fs,β1(s)(sa)Ts(β2)(sa)=ϕ(t)Ts(ϕ)(sa)=ϕ(t)fs,ϕ(s)(sa)=ϕ(t)ϕ(s)f(a)=fs,β2(s)(sa). \begin{align*} T_s(\beta_1)(sa) &= T_{ts}(\phi)(tsa) = f_{ts, \phi(ts)}(tsa) \\ &= \phi(ts)f(a) = f_{s, \beta_1(s)}(sa) \\ T_s(\beta_2)(sa) &= \phi(t)T_s(\phi)(sa) = \phi(t)f_{s, \phi(s)}(sa) \\ &= \phi(t)\phi(s)f(a) = f_{s, \beta_2(s)}(sa). \end{align*}

Hence (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7) α1\alpha_1 and α2\alpha_2 coincide on a neighbourhood of (eG,eG)(e_G, e_G). The restriction of ϕ\phi to a sufficiently small symmetric open neighbourhood of eGe_G is therefore a morphism of Lie group germs, whence (i).

Let G1,G2,ϕ1,ϕ2G_1, G_2, \phi_1, \phi_2 be as in (ii) and let us prove that ϕ1,ϕ2\phi_1, \phi_2 coincide on a neighbourhood of eGe_G. There exists an open neighbourhood WW of eGe_G such that ϕ1(ts)=ϕ1(t)ϕ1(s)\phi_1(ts) = \phi_1(t)\phi_1(s), ϕ2(ts)=ϕ2(t)ϕ2(s)\phi_2(ts) = \phi_2(t)\phi_2(s) for all s,ts, t in WW. Then, if s∈Ws \in W and a∈L(G)a \in L(G),

Ts(ϕi)(sa)=ϕi(s)Te(ϕi)(a)=ϕi(s)f(a)=fs,ϕi(s)(sa) T_s(\phi_i)(sa) = \phi_i(s)T_e(\phi_i)(a) = \phi_i(s)f(a) = f_{s, \phi_i(s)}(sa)

for i=1,2i = 1, 2. As ϕ1(eG)=eH=ϕ2(eG)\phi_1(e_G) = e_H = \phi_2(e_G), it follows from Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7 that ϕ1\phi_1 and ϕ2\phi_2 coincide on a neighbourhood of eGe_G.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.