Let G1 and G2 be Lie group germs and X1 and X2 manifolds of class Cr (r≥2). For i=1,2, let ψi be a law chunk of left operation of class Cr of Gi on Xi and Di the associated law of infinitesimal operation. Let μ:G1→G2 be a morphism and ϕ:X1→X2 a mapping of class Cr. Suppose that, for all a∈L(G), the vector fields (D1)a and (D2)L(μ)a are ϕ-related (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 8.2.6). Then there exists a neighbourhood Ω of {e}×X1 in G1×X1 such that ϕ(ψ1(g,x))=ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x)) for all (g,x)∈Ω.
Let p1:G1×X2→G1,p2:G1×X2→X2 be the canonical projections. For all (g1,x2)∈G1×X2, let fg1,x2 be the mapping g1a↦(D2)L(μ)a(x2) of Tg1(G1)=g1L(G1) into Tx2(X2). The fg1,x2 define a morphism of p1∗T(G1) into p2∗T(X2).
Let x0∈X1. There exist an open neighbourhood G of e in G1 and an open neighbourhood X of x0 in X1 such that ψ1(g,x) and ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x)) are defined for (g,x)∈G×X. We write, for (g,x)∈G×X,
α(g,x)=ϕ(ψ1(g,x))∈X2,β(g,x)=ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x))∈X2. If
G and
X are sufficiently small, then, for all
(a,g,x)∈L(G1)×G×X,
(Tα)(ag,0x)(Tβ)(ag,0x)=(Tϕ)((D1)a(ψ1(g,x)))=(D2)L(μ)a(ϕ(ψ1(g,x)))=(D2)L(μ)aα(g,x),=(Tψ2)(L(μ)a.μ(g),ϕ(x))=(D2)L(μ)a(ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x)))=(D2)L(μ)aβ(g,x).
Hence for x∈X, the morphisms g↦α(g,x) and g↦β(g,x) are integrals of f; as
β(e,x)=ϕ(x)=α(e,x) for all
x∈X, it follows from
Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7, that
α and
β coincide on a neighbourhood of
(e,x0). Hence the proposition.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.