Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 0ADI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ADI].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 4. Passage from Lie algebras to Lie groups

Let G1G_1 and G2G_2 be Lie group germs and X1X_1 and X2X_2 manifolds of class CrC^r (r≥2r \geq 2). For i=1,2i = 1, 2, let ψi\psi_i be a law chunk of left operation of class CrC^r of GiG_i on XiX_i and DiD_i the associated law of infinitesimal operation. Let μ:G1→G2\mu : G_1 \to G_2 be a morphism and ϕ:X1→X2\phi : X_1 \to X_2 a mapping of class CrC^r. Suppose that, for all a∈L(G)a \in L(G), the vector fields (D1)a(D_1)_a and (D2)L(μ)a(D_2)_{L(\mu)a} are ϕ\phi-related (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 8.2.6). Then there exists a neighbourhood Ω\Omega of {e}×X1\{e\} \times X_1 in G1×X1G_1 \times X_1 such that ϕ(ψ1(g,x))=ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x))\phi(\psi_1(g, x)) = \psi_2(\mu(g), \phi(x)) for all (g,x)∈Ω(g, x) \in \Omega.

Let p1:G1×X2→G1,p2:G1×X2→X2p_1 : G_1 \times X_2 \to G_1, p_2 : G_1 \times X_2 \to X_2 be the canonical projections. For all (g1,x2)∈G1×X2(g_1, x_2) \in G_1 \times X_2, let fg1,x2f_{g_1, x_2} be the mapping g1a↦(D2)L(μ)a(x2)g_1 a \mapsto (D_2)_{L(\mu)a}(x_2) of Tg1(G1)=g1L(G1)T_{g_1}(G_1) = g_1 L(G_1) into Tx2(X2)T_{x_2}(X_2). The fg1,x2f_{g_1, x_2} define a morphism of p1∗T(G1)p_1^*T(G_1) into p2∗T(X2)p_2^*T(X_2).

Let x0∈X1x_0 \in X_1. There exist an open neighbourhood GG of ee in G1G_1 and an open neighbourhood XX of x0x_0 in X1X_1 such that ψ1(g,x)\psi_1(g, x) and ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x))\psi_2(\mu(g), \phi(x)) are defined for (g,x)∈G×X(g, x) \in G \times X. We write, for (g,x)∈G×X(g, x) \in G \times X,

α(g,x)=ϕ(ψ1(g,x))∈X2,β(g,x)=ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x))∈X2. \alpha(g, x) = \phi(\psi_1(g, x)) \in X_2, \qquad \beta(g, x) = \psi_2(\mu(g), \phi(x)) \in X_2.
If GG and XX are sufficiently small, then, for all (a,g,x)∈L(G1)×G×X(a, g, x) \in L(G_1) \times G \times X,
(Tα)(ag,0x)=(Tϕ)((D1)a(ψ1(g,x)))=(D2)L(μ)a(ϕ(ψ1(g,x)))=(D2)L(μ)aα(g,x),(Tβ)(ag,0x)=(Tψ2)(L(μ)a.μ(g),ϕ(x))=(D2)L(μ)a(ψ2(μ(g),ϕ(x)))=(D2)L(μ)aβ(g,x). \begin{align*} (T\alpha)(ag, 0_x) &= (T\phi)((D_1)_a(\psi_1(g, x))) \\ &= (D_2)_{L(\mu)a}(\phi(\psi_1(g, x))) \\ &= (D_2)_{L(\mu)a}\alpha(g, x), \\ (T\beta)(ag, 0_x) &= (T\psi_2)(L(\mu)a.\mu(g), \phi(x)) \\ &= (D_2)_{L(\mu)a}(\psi_2(\mu(g), \phi(x))) \\ &= (D_2)_{L(\mu)a}\beta(g, x). \end{align*}

Hence for x∈Xx \in X, the morphisms g↦α(g,x)g \mapsto \alpha(g, x) and g↦β(g,x)g \mapsto \beta(g, x) are integrals of ff; as

β(e,x)=ϕ(x)=α(e,x) \beta(e, x) = \phi(x) = \alpha(e, x)
for all x∈Xx \in X, it follows from Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, R, 9.3.7, that α\alpha and β\beta coincide on a neighbourhood of (e,x0)(e, x_0). Hence the proposition.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.