Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0AJT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AJT].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter III, § 9. Commutators, centralizers and normalizers in a Lie group

Let G be a group (resp. a topological group), G' a normal subgroup of G, V a finite-dimensional vector space over a commutative field k (resp. over K), ρ\rho a linear representation (resp. a continuous linear representation) of G on V and ρ′=ρ∣G′\rho' = \rho|_{G'}. (i) If ρ\rho is semi-simple, ρ′\rho' is semi-simple. (ii) If ρ′\rho' is semi-simple and every finite-dimensional linear k-representation (resp. continuous linear K-representation) of G/G′G/G' (resp. G/G‾′G/\overline{G}') is semi-simple, then ρ\rho is semi-simple. Suppose that ρ\rho is semi-simple; we prove that ρ′\rho' is semi-simple. It suffices to consider the case where ρ\rho is simple. Let V′V' be a minimal non-zero sub-G'-module of V. For all g∈Gg \in G, ρ(G′)ρ(g)V′=ρ(g)ρ(G′)V′=ρ(g)V′\rho(G')\rho(g)V' = \rho(g)\rho(G')V' = \rho(g)V', in other words ρ(g)V′\rho(g)V' is stable under ρ(G′)\rho(G'); if V′′V'' is a sub-G′G'-module of ρ(g)V′\rho(g)V', then ρ(g)−1V′′\rho(g)^{-1}V'' is a sub-G′G'-module of V′V' and hence V′′V'' is equal to {0}\{0\} or ρ(g)V′\rho(g)V'.

Thus, for all g∈Gg \in G, ρ(g)V′\rho(g)V' is a simple G′G'-module. But ∑g∈Gρ(g)V′\sum_{g \in G} \rho(g)V' is a non-zero sub-GG-module of VV, whence V=∑g∈Gρ(g)V′V = \sum_{g \in G} \rho(g)V'. Hence ρ′\rho' is semi-simple.

Suppose that ρ′\rho' is semi-simple. Let WW be a non-zero sub-GG-module of VV. As ρ′\rho' is semi-simple, there exists a projector f0f_0 of VV onto WW which commutes with ρ′(G)\rho'(G). Let EE be the set of f∈L(V,V)f \in \mathscr{L}(V, V) which commute with ρ(G′)\rho(G'), which map VV into WW and whose restriction to WW is a homothety; for f∈Ef \in E, let α(f)\alpha(f) denote the ratio of the homothety f∣Wf|W. Then f0∈Ef_0 \in E and α(f0)=1\alpha(f_0) = 1. Clearly α\alpha is a linear form on EE. Let F=Ker αF = \mathrm{Ker}\, \alpha, which is a hyperplane of EE. For f∈Ef \in E and g∈Gg \in G, we write σ(g)f=ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g)−1\sigma(g)f = \rho(g) \circ f \circ \rho(g)^{-1}; then σ(g)f\sigma(g)f maps VV into WW and its restriction to WW is the homothety of ratio α(f′)\alpha(f'); if g′∈G′g' \in G', then

σ(g)f∘ρ(g′)=ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g)−1∘ρ(g′)=ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g−1g′g)∘ρ(g−1)=ρ(g)∘ρ(g−1g′g)∘f∘ρ(g−1)=ρ(g′)∘ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g−1)=ρ(g′)∘σ(g)f. \begin{align*} \sigma(g)f \circ \rho(g') &= \rho(g) \circ f \circ \rho(g)^{-1} \circ \rho(g') \\ &= \rho(g) \circ f \circ \rho(g^{-1}g'g) \circ \rho(g^{-1}) \\ &= \rho(g) \circ \rho(g^{-1}g'g) \circ f \circ \rho(g^{-1}) \\ &= \rho(g') \circ \rho(g) \circ f \circ \rho(g^{-1}) \\ &= \rho(g') \circ \sigma(g)f. \end{align*}
Hence σ(g)f∈E\sigma(g)f \in E. Therefore σ\sigma is a linear kk-representation (resp. continuous linear KK-representation) of GG on EE leaving FF stable. Then σ(g)=IdE\sigma(g) = \mathrm{Id}_E for g∈G′g \in G' and hence for g∈G′‾g \in \overline{G'} in the topological case. Suppose that every finite-dimensional kk-linear representation (resp. continuous KK-linear representation) of G/G′G/G' (resp. G/G′‾G/\overline{G'}) is semi-simple. Then there exists in EE a supplement of FF which is stable under GG. In other words, there exists f∈Ef \in E such that α(f)=1\alpha(f) = 1, which is invariant under GG. Then ff is a projector of VV onto WW, and, for g∈Gg \in G, ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g−1)=f\rho(g) \circ f \circ \rho(g^{-1}) = f, that is ff commutes with ρ(G)\rho(G). Thus ρ\rho is semi-simple.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.