Let G be a group (resp. a topological group), G' a normal subgroup of G, V a finite-dimensional vector space over a commutative field k (resp. over K), ρ a linear representation (resp. a continuous linear representation) of G on V and ρ′=ρ∣G′. (i) If ρ is semi-simple, ρ′ is semi-simple. (ii) If ρ′ is semi-simple and every finite-dimensional linear k-representation (resp. continuous linear K-representation) of G/G′ (resp. G/G′) is semi-simple, then ρ is semi-simple. Suppose that ρ is semi-simple; we prove that ρ′ is semi-simple. It suffices to consider the case where ρ is simple. Let V′ be a minimal non-zero sub-G'-module of V. For all g∈G, ρ(G′)ρ(g)V′=ρ(g)ρ(G′)V′=ρ(g)V′, in other words ρ(g)V′ is stable under ρ(G′); if V′′ is a sub-G′-module of ρ(g)V′, then ρ(g)−1V′′ is a sub-G′-module of V′ and hence V′′ is equal to {0} or ρ(g)V′.
Thus, for all g∈G, ρ(g)V′ is a simple G′-module. But ∑g∈Gρ(g)V′ is a non-zero sub-G-module of V, whence V=∑g∈Gρ(g)V′. Hence ρ′ is semi-simple.
Suppose that ρ′ is semi-simple. Let W be a non-zero sub-G-module of V. As ρ′ is semi-simple, there exists a projector f0 of V onto W which commutes with ρ′(G). Let E be the set of f∈L(V,V) which commute with ρ(G′), which map V into W and whose restriction to W is a homothety; for f∈E, let α(f) denote the ratio of the homothety f∣W. Then f0∈E and α(f0)=1. Clearly α is a linear form on E. Let F=Kerα, which is a hyperplane of E. For f∈E and g∈G, we write σ(g)f=ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g)−1; then σ(g)f maps V into W and its restriction to W is the homothety of ratio α(f′); if g′∈G′, then
σ(g)f∘ρ(g′)=ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g)−1∘ρ(g′)=ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g−1g′g)∘ρ(g−1)=ρ(g)∘ρ(g−1g′g)∘f∘ρ(g−1)=ρ(g′)∘ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g−1)=ρ(g′)∘σ(g)f. Hence
σ(g)f∈E. Therefore
σ is a linear
k-representation (resp. continuous linear
K-representation) of
G on
E leaving
F stable. Then
σ(g)=IdE for
g∈G′ and hence for
g∈G′ in the topological case. Suppose that every finite-dimensional
k-linear representation (resp. continuous
K-linear representation) of
G/G′ (resp.
G/G′) is semi-simple. Then there exists in
E a supplement of
F which is stable under
G. In other words, there exists
f∈E such that
α(f)=1, which is invariant under
G. Then
f is a projector of
V onto
W, and, for
g∈G,
ρ(g)∘f∘ρ(g−1)=f, that is
f commutes with
ρ(G). Thus
ρ is semi-simple.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.