Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 0ALT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ALT].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IV, § 1. Coxeter Groups

Assume that SS consists of two distinct elements ss and s′s' of order 2.

(i) The subgroup PP of WW generated by p=ss′p = ss' is normal, and WW is the semi-direct product of the subgroup T={1,s}T = \{1, s\} and PP. Moreover, (W:P)=2(W : P) = 2.

(ii) Let mm be the order (finite or infinite) of pp. Then m≥2m \geq 2 and WW is of order 2m2m. There is a unique isomorphism φ\varphi from DmD_m to WW such that φ(ρ)=s\varphi(\rho) = s and φ(ρ′)=s′\varphi(\rho') = s'.

(i) We have sps−1=sss′s=s′s=p−1sps^{-1} = sss's = s's = p^{-1}, and hence

spns−1=p−n sp^n s^{-1} = p^{-n}

for every integer nn. Since WW is generated by {s,s′}\{ s, s' \}, and hence by {s,p}\{ s, p \}, the subgroup PP is normal. It follows that TPTP is a subgroup of WW, and since TPTP contains ss and s′=sps' = sp, we have W=TP=P∪sPW = TP = P \cup sP. To prove (i), it is therefore enough to show that W≠PW \neq P. If W=PW = P, the group WW would be commutative, so p2=s2s′2=1p^2 = s^2 {s'}^2 = 1. But then the only elements of W=PW = P would be 1 and pp, contradicting the hypothesis that WW contains at least three elements, namely 1, ss and s′s'.

(ii) Since s≠s′s \neq s', we have p≠1p \neq 1 and so m≥2m \geq 2. Since PP is of order mm and (W:P)=2(W : P) = 2, the order of WW is 2m2m. If mm is finite (resp. infinite), there exists an isomorphism φ′\varphi' from Z/mZ\mathbf{Z}/m\mathbf{Z} (resp. Z\mathbf{Z}) to PP taking π\pi to pp. Moreover, there exists an isomorphism φ′′\varphi'' from M={1,−1}M = \{ 1, -1 \} to TT taking −1-1 to ss. The group WW is the semi-direct product of TT and PP. In view of the formulas (9) and ρπnρ−1=π−n\rho \pi^n \rho^{-1} = \pi^{-n}, φ′\varphi' and φ′′\varphi'' induce an isomorphism φ\varphi from DmD_m to WW such that φ(ρ)=s\varphi(\rho) = s and φ(π)=p\varphi(\pi) = p, and hence φ(ρ′)=s′\varphi(\rho') = s'. The uniqueness of φ\varphi follows from the fact that DmD_m is generated by {ρ,ρ′}\{ \rho, \rho' \}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.