Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0ARP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ARP].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 4. The geometric representation of a Coxeter group

(i) The cone U is convex.

(ii) Every closed segment contained in U meets only finitely many elements of F\mathfrak{F}.

(iii) The cone C‾\overline{C} is a fundamental domain for the action of W on U.

To prove (iii), it is enough to show that, if x∗,y∗∈C‾x^*, y^* \in \overline{C} and w∈Ww \in W are such that w(x∗)=y∗w(x^*) = y^*, then x∗=y∗x^* = y^*. Now there exist two subsets X and Y of S such that x∗∈CXx^* \in C_X and y∗∈CYy^* \in C_Y; we have w(CX)∩CY≠∅w(C_X) \cap C_Y \neq \varnothing, and Prop. 5 shows that X=YX = Y and w∈WXw \in W_X, which implies that x∗=y∗x^* = y^*.

Now let x∗,y∗∈Ux^*, y^* \in U; we shall show that the segment [x∗y∗][x^*y^*] is covered by finitely many elements of F\mathfrak{F}, which will establish both (i) and (ii). By transforming x∗x^* and y∗y^* by the same element of W, we can assume that x∗∈C‾x^* \in \overline{C}. Let w∈Ww \in W be such that y∗∈w(C‾)y^* \in w(\overline{C}). We argue by induction on the length of ww. For s∈Ss \in S, the relation w(C‾)⊄As‾w(\overline{C}) \not\subset \overline{A_s} is equivalent to w(C)⊄Asw(C) \not\subset A_s and hence to l(sw)<l(w)l(sw) < l(w) (cf. no. 4). Prop. 7 of no. 8 of Chap. IV, §1 now implies that there exist only finitely many s∈Ss \in S such that w(C‾)⊄As‾w(\overline{C}) \not\subset \overline{A_s}. The set T of s∈Ss \in S such that ⟨y∗,es⟩<0\langle y^*, e_s \rangle < 0 is thus finite. On the other hand, the intersection C‾∩[x∗y∗]\overline{C} \cap [x^*y^*] is a closed segment [x∗z∗][x^*z^*]. If z∗=y∗z^* = y^*, that is if y∗∈C‾y^* \in \overline{C}, there exist subsets X and Y of S such that x∗∈CXx^* \in C_X and y∗∈CYy^* \in C_Y. The open segment ]x∗y∗[]x^*y^*[ is then contained in CX∩YC_{X \cap Y}, so [x∗y∗]⊂CX∪CY∪CX∩Y[x^*y^*] \subset C_X \cup C_Y \cup C_{X \cap Y}. If z∗≠y∗z^* \neq y^*, there exists an s∈Ts \in T such that z∗∈Hsz^* \in H_s. Then w(C)⊄Asw(C) \not\subset A_s and l(sw)<l(w)l(sw) < l(w). The induction hypothesis thus implies that the segment [z∗y∗]=s([z∗(s(y∗))])[z^*y^*] = s([z^*(s(y^*))]) is covered by a finite number of elements of F\mathfrak{F}, and hence so is

[x∗y∗]=[x∗z∗]∪[z∗y∗] [x^*y^*] = [x^*z^*] \cup [z^*y^*]

since [x∗z∗]⊂C‾[x^*z^*] \subset \overline{C}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.