Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 0ARS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ARS].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 4. The geometric representation of a Coxeter group

The following properties are equivalent: (1) WW is finite. (2) The form BMB_M is positive and non-degenerate.

(1) ⟹\Longrightarrow (2). Let S=⋃iSiS = \bigcup_i S_i be the decomposition of SS into connected components (Chap. IV, §1§ 1, no. 9), and let W=∏iWiW = \prod_i W_i be the corresponding decomposition of WW. The space EE can be identified with the direct sum of the spaces Ei=RSiE_i = \mathbf{R}^{S_i}, and BMB_M can be identified with the direct sum of the corresponding forms BMiB_{M_i}. We are thus reduced to the case when (W,S)(W, S) is irreducible. Since WW is assumed to be finite, EE is a semi-simple W-module (Appendix, Prop. 2). By the Cor. to Prop. 5, it follows that EE is absolutely simple. Let B′B' be a positive non-degenerate form on EE, and let B′′B'' be the sum of its transforms under WW. Since B′′B'' is invariant under WW, it is proportional to BMB_M (§2§ 2, no. 1, Prop. 1); since BM(es,cs)=1B_M(e_s, c_s) = 1 for all s∈Ss \in S, the coefficient of proportionality is >0> 0, and since B′′B'' is positive so is BMB_M, which proves (2).

(2) ⟹\Longrightarrow (1). If BMB_M is positive non-degenerate, the orthogonal group O(BM)O(B_M) is compact (Integration, Chap. VII, §3§ 3, no. 1). Since σ(W)\sigma(W) is a discrete subgroup of O(BM)O(B_M) (Cor. 3 of Th. 1), it follows that σ(W)\sigma(W) is finite, hence so is WW. Q.E.D.

The following result has been established in the course of the proof:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.