The restriction of BM to Es,s′ is positive, and it is non-degenerate if and only if m is finite.
Let z=xes+yes′, with x,y∈R, be an element of Es,s′. We have
BM(z,z)=x2−2xycosmπ+y2=(x−y⋅cosmπ)2+y2sin2mπ,
which shows that BM is positive on Es,s′, and that it is non-degenerate there if and only if sinmπ=0. The proposition follows.
The reflections σs and σs′ leave Es,s′ stable. We are going to determine the order of the restriction of σsσs′ to Es,s′. We distinguish two cases:
a)m=+∞.
Let u=es+es′. We have BM(u,es)=BM(u,es′)=0, so u is invariant under σs and σs′. Moreover,
σs(σs′(es))=σs(es+2es′)=3es+2es′=2u+es;
hence
(σsσs′)n(es)=2nu+esfor all n∈Z.
It follows that the restriction of σsσs′ to Es,s′ is of infinite order.
b)mis finite.
The form BH provides Es,s′ with the structure of a euclidean plane. Since the scalar product of es and es′ is equal to −cosmπ=cos(π−mπ), we can orient Es,s′ so that the angle between the half-lines R+es and R+es′ is equal to π−mπ. If D and D' denote the lines orthogonal to es and es′,
(D′,D)=π−(D,D′)=mπ.
Now, the restrictions σs and σs′ of σs and σs′ to Es,s′ are the orthogonal symmetries with respect to D and D'. By the Cor. to Prop. 6 of § 2, no. 5, it follows that σsσs′is the rotation with anglem2π. In particular, its order is m.
We now return to E:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.