Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 0ARZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ARZ].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 4. The geometric representation of a Coxeter group

Let WW be a group of displacements of a euclidean affine space AA, satisfying the assumptions of § 3. Assume that WW is infinite, essential and irreducible. Then the form BMB_M attached to the Coxeter matrix MM of WW is positive degenerate and there exists a unique isomorphism from the affine space AMA_M associated to MM to AA, commuting with the action of WW. This isomorphism transforms the scalar product of AMA_M into a multiple of the scalar product of AA.

Let C0C_0 be a chamber of AA and let SS be the set of orthogonal reflections with respect to the walls of C0C_0. If ηs\eta_s denotes the unit vector orthogonal to the hyperplane NsN_s associated to the reflection ss and on the same side of NsN_s as C0C_0 (§ 3, Prop. 3), the form BMB_M is such that BM(es,et)=(ηs∣ηt)B_M(e_s, e_t) = (\eta_s | \eta_t) for s,t∈Ss, t \in S. It is thus positive. Since the ηs\eta_s are linearly dependent (§ 3, no. 9, Prop. 8), it is degenerate.

We can thus apply the preceding constructions to MM. With the same notation as above, (εs∣εt)=(ηs∣ηt)(\varepsilon_s | \varepsilon_t) = (\eta_s | \eta_t) and there exists a unique isomorphism φ\varphi of Hilbert spaces from TT to the space of translations of AA such that φ(εs)=ηs\varphi(\varepsilon_s) = \eta_s. Let aa and bb be two distinct vertices of C0C_0 and s0s_0 the reflection in SS such that a∉Ns0a \notin N_{s_0}. Put λ=(ηs∣a−b)\lambda = (\eta_s | a - b) and let ψ\psi be the affine bijection from AMA_M to AA defined by

ψ(as0+x)=a+vs0λφ(x)for x∈T. \psi(a_{s_0} + x) = a + v_{s_0} \lambda \varphi(x) \quad \text{for } x \in T.

It is then immediate that ψ(Ls)=Ns\psi(L_s) = N_s for all s∈Ss \in S and that ψ\psi transforms the scalar product of AMA_M into a multiple of that on AA. It follows at once that ψ\psi commutes with the action of WW. Finally, the uniqueness of ψ\psi is evident, for asa_s for example is the unique point of AMA_M invariant under the reflections t∈S,t≠st \in S, t \neq s.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.