With the assumptions and notation of Th. 3, let H be the set of pseudo-reflections belonging to G and distinct from 1. Assume that K is of characteristic 0. ThenCard(H)=∑i=1l(ki−1).
By Prop. 3 of the Appendix, we can assume that K is algebraically closed. For any g∈G, let λ1(g),…,λl(g) be its eigenvalues. Since every g∈G is diagonalizable (Appendix, Prop. 2), g=1 if and only if all of the λi(g) are equal to 1, and g∈H if and only if the number of λi(g) equal to 1 is l−1 (we then denote by λ(g) the eigenvalue distinct from 1). Prop. 1 of no. 1 and Lemma 3 prove that
qi=1∏l(1−Tki)−1=g∈G∑(det(1−gT))−1
in K[[T]], and hence in K(T). Consequently, we have in K(T)
It follows that q−∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1) vanishes for T=1, so q=k1k2…kl, which we knew already by the Cor. of Th. 3. This granted, let Q(T) be the polynomial (1−T)−1(q−∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1)). Differentiating the equality (1−T)Q(T)=q−∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1) and putting T=1, we see that −Q(1) is the value for T=1 of
Now the elements of G that leave fixed the points of a given hyperplane leave stable a complementary line of the hyperplane (Appendix, Prop. 2), and so form a cyclic subgroup G' of G by Algebra, Chap. V, § 11, no. 1, Th. 1. Let t be the order of G'; the values of λ(g) for g∈G′ are θ,θ2,…,θt−1 with θ a primitive tth root of unity. We have 1−θi1+1−θt−i1=1, so ∑g∈G′,g=11−λ(g)1=21(t−1)=21Card(H∩G′). The equality (18) thus proves the proposition.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.