Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 0ASY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0ASY].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 5. Invariants in the symmetric algebra

With the assumptions and notation of Th. 3, let H be the set of pseudo-reflections belonging to G and distinct from 1. Assume that K is of characteristic 0. Then Card⁡(H)=∑i=1l(ki−1)\operatorname{Card}(H) = \sum_{i=1}^{l} (k_i - 1).

By Prop. 3 of the Appendix, we can assume that K is algebraically closed. For any g∈Gg \in G, let λ1(g),…,λl(g)\lambda_1(g), \ldots, \lambda_l(g) be its eigenvalues. Since every g∈Gg \in G is diagonalizable (Appendix, Prop. 2), g=1g = 1 if and only if all of the λi(g)\lambda_i(g) are equal to 1, and g∈Hg \in H if and only if the number of λi(g)\lambda_i(g) equal to 1 is l−1l - 1 (we then denote by λ(g)\lambda(g) the eigenvalue distinct from 1). Prop. 1 of no. 1 and Lemma 3 prove that

q∏i=1l(1−Tki)−1=∑g∈G(det⁡(1−gT))−1 q \prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 - T^{k_i})^{-1} = \sum_{g \in G} (\det(1 - gT))^{-1}

in K[[T]]K[[T]], and hence in K(T)K(T). Consequently, we have in K(T)K(T)

q(1−T)l−1∏i=1l(1−Tki)=11−T+∑g∈H11−λ(g)T+∑g≠1,g∉H(1−T)l−1det⁡(1−gT), q \frac{(1 - T)^{l-1}}{\prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 - T^{k_i})} = \frac{1}{1 - T} + \sum_{g \in H} \frac{1}{1 - \lambda(g)T} + \sum_{g \neq 1, g \notin H} \frac{(1 - T)^{l-1}}{\det(1 - gT)},

which can be written

q−∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1)(1−T)∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1) \frac{q - \prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 + T + \cdots + T^{k_i-1})}{(1 - T) \prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 + T + \cdots + T^{k_i-1})}
=∑g∈H11−λ(g)T+∑g≠1,g∉H(1−T)l−1det⁡(1−gT). = \sum_{g \in H} \frac{1}{1 - \lambda(g)T} + \sum_{g \neq 1, g \notin H} \frac{(1 - T)^{l-1}}{\det(1 - gT)}.

It follows that q−∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1)q - \prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 + T + \cdots + T^{k_i-1}) vanishes for T=1T = 1, so q=k1k2…klq = k_1 k_2 \ldots k_l, which we knew already by the Cor. of Th. 3. This granted, let Q(T) be the polynomial (1−T)−1(q−∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1))(1 - T)^{-1}(q - \prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 + T + \cdots + T^{k_i-1})). Differentiating the equality (1−T)Q(T)=q−∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1)(1 - T)Q(T) = q - \prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 + T + \cdots + T^{k_i-1}) and putting T=1T = 1, we see that −Q(1)-Q(1) is the value for T=1T = 1 of

−ddt(∏i=1l(1+T+⋯+Tki−1)) -\frac{d}{dt} \left( \prod_{i=1}^{l} (1 + T + \cdots + T^{k_i-1}) \right)
=−∑i=1l((1+2T+⋯+(ki−1)Tki−2)∏j≠i(1+T+⋯+Tkj−1)) = - \sum_{i=1}^{l} ((1 + 2T + \cdots + (k_i - 1)T^{k_i-2}) \prod_{j \neq i} (1 + T + \cdots + T^{k_j-1}))

so

Q(1)=∑i=1l(ki−1)ki2∏j≠ikj=(∏j=1lkj)(∑i=1lki−12). Q(1) = \sum_{i=1}^{l} \frac{(k_i - 1) k_i}{2} \prod_{j \neq i} k_j = \left( \prod_{j=1}^{l} k_j \right) \left( \sum_{i=1}^{l} \frac{k_i - 1}{2} \right).

Returning to (17), we have on the other hand

Q(1)=(∏j=1lkj)(∑g∈H11−λ(g)). Q(1) = \left( \prod_{j=1}^{l} k_j \right) \left( \sum_{g \in H} \frac{1}{1 - \lambda(g)} \right).

Thus,

∑i=1lki−12=∑g∈H11−λ(g).(18) \sum_{i=1}^{l} \frac{k_i - 1}{2} = \sum_{g \in H} \frac{1}{1 - \lambda(g)}. \tag{18}

Now the elements of G that leave fixed the points of a given hyperplane leave stable a complementary line of the hyperplane (Appendix, Prop. 2), and so form a cyclic subgroup G' of G by Algebra, Chap. V, § 11, no. 1, Th. 1. Let t be the order of G'; the values of λ(g)\lambda(g) for g∈G′g \in G' are θ,θ2,…,θt−1\theta, \theta^2, \ldots, \theta^{t-1} with θ\theta a primitive tth root of unity. We have 11−θi+11−θt−i=1\frac{1}{1-\theta^i} + \frac{1}{1-\theta^{t-i}} = 1, so ∑g∈G′,g≠111−λ(g)=12(t−1)=12Card(H∩G′)\sum_{g \in G', g \neq 1} \frac{1}{1-\lambda(g)} = \frac{1}{2}(t-1) = \frac{1}{2}\mathrm{Card}(H \cap G'). The equality (18) thus proves the proposition.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.