Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0AT1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AT1].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 5. Invariants in the symmetric algebra

(i) Let D be the element ∏g∈Heg\prod_{g \in H} e_g of S. The elements of S which are anti-invariant under G are the elements of RD.

(ii) Identify S with the polynomial algebra K[X1,…,Xl]K[X_1, \ldots, X_l] by choosing a basis (X1,…,Xl)(X_1, \ldots, X_l) of V, and let (P1,…,Pl)(P_1, \ldots, P_l) be algebraically independent homogeneous elements of S generating the algebra R (Th. 3). Then the jacobian J=det⁡(∂Pi∂Xj)J = \det \left( \frac{\partial P_i}{\partial X_j} \right) is of the form λD\lambda D, where λ∈K∗\lambda \in K^*.

a) With the notation in (ii), we have

dP1∧dP2∧…∧dPl=J dX1∧dX2∧…∧dXl, dP_1 \wedge dP_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge dP_l = J \, dX_1 \wedge dX_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge dX_l,

so, for all g∈Gg \in G,

g(J)(det⁡g) dX1∧…∧dXl=g(J) d(gX1)∧…∧d(gXl) g(J)(\det g) \, dX_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge dX_l = g(J) \, d(gX_1) \wedge \ldots \wedge d(gX_l)
=g(dP1∧…∧dPl)=dP1∧…∧dPl=J dX1∧…∧dXl, = g(dP_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge dP_l) = dP_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge dP_l = J \, dX_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge dX_l,

hence J is anti-invariant under G. On the other hand, the field of fractions N of S is a Galois extension of the field of fractions E of R (no. 2); if Δ\Delta is a derivation of E with values in an extension field Ω\Omega of N, Δ\Delta extends to a derivation of N with values in Ω\Omega (Algebra, Chap. V, § 16, no. 4, Th. 3); since the PiP_i are algebraically independent, it follows that dP1∧…∧dPl≠0dP_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge dP_l \neq 0, hence J≠0J \neq 0.

b) Let z be an element of S anti-invariant under G. We show that z is divisible by D in S. Let a be a non-zero vector in V. The elements of G that leave Ka stable leave stable a complementary hyperplane L (Appendix, Prop. 2); an element of G leaving Ka stable is 1 or a pseudo-reflection with vector a if and only if it induces 1 on L; the pseudo-reflections with vector a belonging to G thus constitute, together with 1, a cyclic subgroup G′G' of G; let t be its order. There exists a basis (X1,…,Xl)(X_1, \ldots, X_l) of V such that a=X1a = X_1, X2∈L,…,Xl∈LX_2 \in L, \ldots, X_l \in L, and z can be identified with a polynomial P(X1,…,Xl)P(X_1, \ldots, X_l) with coefficients in K. From g(z)=(det⁡g)−1zg(z) = (\det g)^{-1} z for g∈G′g \in G', we see that X1X_1 only appears in P(X1,…,Xl)P(X_1, \ldots, X_l) with exponents congruent to -1 modulo t. Thus, P(X1,…,Xl)P(X_1, \ldots, X_l) is divisible by X1t−1=at−1X_1^{t-1} = a^{t-1}. Now D is, up to a scalar factor, the product of the at−1a^{t-1} for those a∈Va \in V such that t>1t > 1, and these elements of S are mutually coprime. Since S is factorial, z is divisible by D.

c) By a) and b), J is divisible by D in S. Now

deg⁡J=∑i=1l(ki−1)=Card⁡(H) \deg J = \sum_{i=1}^l (k_i - 1) = \operatorname{Card}(H)

(Prop. 3), so deg⁡J=deg⁡D\deg J = \deg D, hence J=λDJ = \lambda D with λ∈K\lambda \in K. Since J≠0,λ∈K∗J \neq 0, \lambda \in K^*. This proves (ii).

d) Parts a) and c) of the proof show that D is anti-invariant under G. Next, if y∈Ry \in R, it is clear that yDyD is anti-invariant under G. Finally, if z∈Sz \in S is anti-invariant under G, we have seen in b) that there exists y∈Sy \in S such that z=yDz = yD. Since S is integral, y∈Ry \in R. This proves (i).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.