Proposition 5
Tag 0AT1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AT1].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter V, § 5. Invariants in the symmetric algebra
(i) Let D be the element of S. The elements of S which are anti-invariant under G are the elements of RD.
(ii) Identify S with the polynomial algebra by choosing a basis of V, and let be algebraically independent homogeneous elements of S generating the algebra R (Th. 3). Then the jacobian is of the form , where .
a) With the notation in (ii), we have
so, for all ,
hence J is anti-invariant under G. On the other hand, the field of fractions N of S is a Galois extension of the field of fractions E of R (no. 2); if is a derivation of E with values in an extension field of N, extends to a derivation of N with values in (Algebra, Chap. V, § 16, no. 4, Th. 3); since the are algebraically independent, it follows that , hence .
b) Let z be an element of S anti-invariant under G. We show that z is divisible by D in S. Let a be a non-zero vector in V. The elements of G that leave Ka stable leave stable a complementary hyperplane L (Appendix, Prop. 2); an element of G leaving Ka stable is 1 or a pseudo-reflection with vector a if and only if it induces 1 on L; the pseudo-reflections with vector a belonging to G thus constitute, together with 1, a cyclic subgroup of G; let t be its order. There exists a basis of V such that , , and z can be identified with a polynomial with coefficients in K. From for , we see that only appears in with exponents congruent to -1 modulo t. Thus, is divisible by . Now D is, up to a scalar factor, the product of the for those such that , and these elements of S are mutually coprime. Since S is factorial, z is divisible by D.
c) By a) and b), J is divisible by D in S. Now
(Prop. 3), so , hence with . Since . This proves (ii).
d) Parts a) and c) of the proof show that D is anti-invariant under G. Next, if , it is clear that is anti-invariant under G. Finally, if is anti-invariant under G, we have seen in b) that there exists such that . Since S is integral, . This proves (i).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Exercise 2, § 6
- Exercise 3, § 5
- Proposition 6, § 5
- Proposition 3, § 6
- Exercise 18, § 8
- Exercise 8, § 9