Bourbaki

Proposition 23

Tag 0AVX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AVX].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 1. Root systems

Let PP be a subset of RR and V1V_1 (resp. Γ\Gamma) the vector subspace (resp. the subgroup) of VV generated by PP. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) P is closed and symmetric; (ii) P is closed, and P is a root system in V1V_1; (iii) Γ∩R=P\Gamma \cap R = P.

Assume that these conditions are satisfied. For any α∈P\alpha \in P, let α1~\alpha_1 \tilde{} be the restriction of α~\alpha \tilde{} to V1V_1. Then the map α↦α1~\alpha \mapsto \alpha_1 \tilde{} is the canonical bijection from the root system PP to P~P \tilde{}.

(iii) ⟹\Longrightarrow (i): clear.

(i) ⟹\Longrightarrow (ii): assume that PP is closed and symmetric. First, PP satisfies (RS_I) in V1V_1. We show that, if α,β∈P\alpha, \beta \in P, then sα(β)∈Ps_\alpha(\beta) \in P. This is clear if α\alpha and β\beta are proportional. Otherwise, sα(β)=β−n(β,α)αs_\alpha(\beta) = \beta - n(\beta, \alpha)\alpha and β−pα∈R\beta - p\alpha \in R for all rational integers pp between 0 and n(β,α)n(\beta, \alpha) (Prop. 9, no. 3), so

β−n(β,α)α∈P \beta - n(\beta, \alpha)\alpha \in P
since PP is closed and symmetric. Thus, sα,α1(P)=Ps_{\alpha, \alpha_1}(P) = P, and PP satisfies (RS_{II}). It is clear that PP satisfies (RS_{III}). Thus, PP satisfies (ii), and we have proved the last assertion of the proposition at the same time.

(ii) ⟹\Longrightarrow (iii): we show that, if condition (ii) is satisfied, then Γ∩R=P\Gamma \cap R = P. It is clear that P⊆Γ∩RP \subseteq \Gamma \cap R. Let β∈Γ∩R\beta \in \Gamma \cap R. Since β∈Γ\beta \in \Gamma and P=−PP = -P, β=α1+α2+⋯+αk\beta = \alpha_1 + \alpha_2 + \cdots + \alpha_k with α1,…,αk∈P\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_k \in P. We shall prove that β∈P\beta \in P. This is clear if k=1k = 1. We argue by induction on kk. We have

0<(β∣β)=∑i=1k(β∣αi), 0 < (\beta|\beta) = \sum_{i=1}^{k} (\beta|\alpha_i),
so (β∣αi)>0(\beta|\alpha_i) > 0 for some index ii. If β=αi\beta = \alpha_i, then β∈P\beta \in P. Otherwise, β−αi∈R\beta - \alpha_i \in R (Cor. of Th. 1, no. 3), so β−αi∈P\beta - \alpha_i \in P by the induction hypothesis, hence β∈P\beta \in P since PP is closed.

The conditions of Prop. 23 can be realised with V1=VV_1 = V and yet P≠RP \neq R. For example, this is the case when RR is a system of type G2G_2 and PP a system of type A2A_2; cf. Plate X.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.