Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 0AXD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AXD].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 2. Affine Weyl group

Let F be a real Hilbert space of finite dimension l. Let H\mathfrak{H} be the set of affine hyperplanes of F and G the group generated by the orthogonal reflections sHs_H with respect to the hyperplanes H∈HH \in \mathfrak{H}. Assume that the conditions of Chap. V, § 3 are satisfied (i.e. that g(H)∈Hg(H) \in \mathfrak{H} for all H∈HH \in \mathfrak{H} and g∈Gg \in G, and that G acts properly on F). Assume also that 0 is a special point for G and that the group T of translations belonging to G is of rank l. Then there exists a unique reduced root system R in V=F∗V = F^* such that the canonical isomorphism from F to V∗V^* transforms G to the affine Weyl group WaW_a of R.

We remark first of all that the assumption on T implies that G is essential: otherwise, the affine space F would decompose into a product F0×F1F_0 \times F_1, with dim⁡F1<l\dim F_1 < l, the group G being identified with a group of displacements acting properly on F1F_1 (Chap. V, § 3, no. 8, Prop. 6), and T would not be of rank l.

Let H0\mathfrak{H}_0 be the set of H∈HH \in \mathfrak{H} such that 0∈H0 \in H. For H∈H0H \in \mathfrak{H}_0, let HH\mathfrak{H}_H be the set of elements of H\mathfrak{H} parallel to H. Since 0 is a special point, H\mathfrak{H} is the union of the HH\mathfrak{H}_H for H∈H0H \in \mathfrak{H}_0. Since T is of rank l, there exists a v∈Fv \in F such that the translation by the vector v belongs to T and v∉Hv \notin H. The hyperplanes H+kvH + kv for k∈Zk \in \mathbf{Z} are pairwise distinct and belong to HH\mathfrak{H}_H. Now let a be a unit vector of F orthogonal to H: then H+(v∣a)a∈HHH + (v|a)a \in \mathfrak{H}_H and since H\mathfrak{H} is locally finite (Chap. V, § 1, no. 1, Lemma 1), there is a smallest real number λ>0\lambda > 0 such that H+λa∈HH + \lambda a \in \mathfrak{H}. We are going to show that HH\mathfrak{H}_H is the set of hyperplanes H+kλaH + k\lambda a for k∈Zk \in \mathbf{Z}. Indeed,

H′=H+λa∈HH H' = H + \lambda a \in \mathfrak{H}_H

and the element sH′∘sHs_{H'} \circ s_H of G is the translation by the vector 2λa2\lambda a (Chap. V, § 2, no. 4, Prop. 5). Consequently, H+2nλa=(sH′sH)n(H)H + 2n\lambda a = (s_{H'} s_H)^n(H) and H+(2n+1)λa=(sH′sH)n(H′)H + (2n + 1)\lambda a = (s_{H'} s_H)^n(H') belongs to HH\mathfrak{H}_H. On the other hand, if L∈HHL \in \mathfrak{H}_H, there exists ξ∈R\xi \in \mathbf{R} such that L=H+ξλaL = H + \xi \lambda a and there exists an integer n such that

either 2n<ξ≤2n+12n < \xi \leq 2n + 1, or 2n−1<ξ≤2n2n - 1 < \xi \leq 2n.

In the first case, (sHsH′)n(L)=H+(ξ−2n)λa(s_H s_{H'})^n(L) = H + (\xi - 2n)\lambda a with

0<(ξ−2n)λ≤λ 0 < (\xi - 2n)\lambda \leq \lambda

and the definition of λ\lambda implies that ξ=2n+1\xi = 2n + 1; in the second case,

sH(sH′sH′′)n(L)=H+(2n−ξ)λawith0≤(2n−ξ)λ<λ s_H(s_{H'} s_{H''})^n(L) = H + (2n - \xi)\lambda a \quad \text{with} \quad 0 \leq (2n - \xi)\lambda < \lambda
and the definition of λ\lambda implies that ξ=2n\xi = 2n.

It follows that if αH\alpha_H is the linear form on FF such that

H′={x∈F∣⟨αH,x⟩=1}, H' = \{ x \in F \mid \langle \alpha_H, x \rangle = 1 \},
the set HH\mathscr{H}_H is the set of hyperplanes LαH,k={x∈F∣⟨αH,x⟩=k}L_{\alpha_H, k} = \{ x \in F \mid \langle \alpha_H, x \rangle = k \} for k∈Zk \in \mathbf{Z}, and αH\alpha_H and −αH-\alpha_H are the only linear forms with this property.

Consequently, the proposition will be proved if we show that the set R of elements of V of the form ±αH\pm \alpha_H is a reduced root system in V.

a) We prove condition (RS_I): it is clear that R is finite (since H0\mathscr{H}_0 is finite) and does not contain 0. Moreover, R generates V. Indeed, if x∈Fx \in F is orthogonal to R, then x∈Hx \in H for all H∈H0H \in \mathscr{H}_0 and the translation by the vector xx commutes with every element of G. Since G is essential, this implies that x=0x = 0.

b) We prove (RS_{II}). For v∈Vv \in V and r∈Rr \in \mathbf{R}, put Lv,r={x∈F∣⟨v,x⟩=r}L_{v, r} = \{ x \in F \mid \langle v, x \rangle = r \} as above; if α∈R\alpha \in R, put Hα=Lα,0H_\alpha = L_{\alpha, 0}, and let sαs_\alpha be the transpose of sHαs_{H_\alpha}. There exists a unique element α∼∈F\alpha^\sim \in F orthogonal to HαH_\alpha and such that ⟨α∼,α⟩=2\langle \alpha^\sim, \alpha \rangle = 2. Then sHα=sα∼,αs_{H_\alpha} = s_{\alpha^\sim, \alpha} and sα=sα,α∼s_\alpha = s_{\alpha, \alpha^\sim}. For β∈R\beta \in R,

Lsα(β),1=sHα(Lβ,1)∈H L_{s_\alpha(\beta), 1} = s_{H_\alpha}(L_{\beta, 1}) \in \mathscr{H}
and there exist γ∈R\gamma \in R and n∈N∗n \in \mathbf{N}^* such that Lsα(β),1=Lγ,nL_{s_\alpha(\beta), 1} = L_{\gamma, n}. Then
sHα(Lγ,1)=Lβ,1/n s_{H_\alpha}(L_{\gamma, 1}) = L_{\beta, 1/n}
and so 1/n∈Z1/n \in \mathbf{Z}. Thus n=1n = 1 and sα(β)=γ∈Rs_\alpha(\beta) = \gamma \in R. This proves (RS_{II}).

c) We prove (RS_{III}). Let α∈R\alpha \in R and set Hα′=Lα,1H'_\alpha = L_{\alpha, 1}. Then

Hα′=Hα+(1/2)α∼; H'_\alpha = H_\alpha + (1/2)\alpha^\sim;
since the translation t(α∼)t(\alpha^\sim) by the vector α∼\alpha^\sim is the product sHα′sHαs_{H'_\alpha} s_{H_\alpha} (Chap. V, § 2, no. 4, Prop. 5), it belongs to T and α∼=t(α∼)(0)\alpha^\sim = t(\alpha^\sim)(0) is a special point for G. Consequently, for all β∈R\beta \in R, there exists a hyperplane Lβ,kL_{\beta, k} passing through α∼\alpha^\sim, with kk an integer, which shows that ⟨β,α∼⟩∈Z\langle \beta, \alpha^\sim \rangle \in \mathbf{Z}, and proves (RS_{III}).

d) Finally, it is clear that R is reduced, for if H,H′∈H0,H≠H′H, H' \in \mathscr{H}_0, H \neq H', the linear forms αH\alpha_H and αH′\alpha_{H'} are not proportional.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.