Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0AXN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0AXN].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VI, § 3. Exponential invariants

Assume that A is factorial (Commutative Algebra, Chap. VII, § 3, no. 1, Def. 1). (i) The ring A[P]A[P] is factorial. (ii) If u,vu, v are non-proportional elements of P, the elements 1−eu,1−ev1 - e^u, 1 - e^v of A[P]A[P] are relatively prime.

Let (p1,p2,…,pl)(p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_l) be a basis of P, and X1,X2,…,XlX_1, X_2, \ldots, X_l be indeterminates. The A-linear map from A[X1,…,Xl,X1−1,…,Xl−1]A[X_1, \ldots, X_l, X_1^{-1}, \ldots, X_l^{-1}] to A[P]A[P] that takes X1n1X2n2…XlnlX_1^{n_1} X_2^{n_2} \ldots X_l^{n_l} (where n1,n2,…,nl∈Zn_1, n_2, \ldots, n_l \in \mathbf{Z}) to en1p1+⋯+nlple^{n_1 p_1 + \cdots + n_l p_l} is an isomorphism of rings. Now A[X1,…,Xl]A[X_1, \ldots, X_l] is a factorial ring (Commutative Algebra, Chap. VII, § 3, no. 5), and A[X1,…,Xl,X1−1,…,Xl−1]A[X_1, \ldots, X_l, X_1^{-1}, \ldots, X_l^{-1}] is the ring of fractions of A[X1,…,Xl]A[X_1, \ldots, X_l], hence is also factorial.

Let P′P' (resp. P′′P'') be the set of elements of P of which some multiple belongs to Zu+Zv\mathbf{Z}u + \mathbf{Z}v (resp. Zu\mathbf{Z}u). Then the groups P/P′P/P' and P′/P′′P'/P'' are torsion-free, so there exists a complement of P′′P'' in P′P' and a complement of P′P' in P. Consequently, there exists a basis (z1,z2,…,zl)(z_1, z_2, \ldots, z_l) of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module P and rational integers j,m,nj, m, n such that u=jz1,v=mz1+nz2,j>0,n>0u = jz_1, v = mz_1 + nz_2, j > 0, n > 0. Putting Xi=eziX_i = e^{z_i} for 1≤i≤l1 \leq i \leq l, we then have 1−eu=1−X1j,1−ev=1−X1mX2n1 - e^u = 1 - X_1^j, 1 - e^v = 1 - X_1^m X_2^n. Let K be an algebraic closure of the field of fractions of A, so that A[P]A[P] can be identified with a subring of the ring B=K[X1,…,Xl,X1−1,…,Xl−1]B = K[X_1, \ldots, X_l, X_1^{-1}, \ldots, X_l^{-1}]. For any jjth root of unity zz, 1−zX11 - zX_1 is extremal in

K[X1,…,Xl]; K[X_1, \ldots, X_l];
moreover, the ideal generated by 1−zX11 - zX_1 contains no monomial in the XiX_i. We conclude that the ideal (1−zX1)B(1 - zX_1)B of B is a prime ideal of height 1

(Commutative Algebra, Chap. VII, § 1, no. 6), hence that 1−zX11 - zX_1 is extremal in B. The extremal factors of 1−X1j1 - X_1^j in B are thus of the form 1−zX11 - zX_1. Now none of these factors divide 1−X1mX2n1 - X_1^m X_2^n in B (for the homomorphism ff from B to B such that f(X1)=z−1,f(Xi)=Xif(X_1) = z^{-1}, f(X_i) = X_i for i≥2i \geq 2, satisfies

f(1−zX1)=0andf(1−X1mX2n)=1−z−mX2n≠0). f(1 - zX_1) = 0 \quad \text{and} \quad f(1 - X_1^m X_2^n) = 1 - z^{-m} X_2^n \neq 0).

Thus, 1−X1j1 - X_1^j and 1−X1mX2n1 - X_1^m X_2^n are relatively prime in B. Consequently, any common divisor of 1−X1j1 - X_1^j and 1−X1mX2n1 - X_1^m X_2^n in A[P]A[P] is invertible in B and so, up to multiplication by an element of the form X1k1X2k2…XlklX_1^{k_1} X_2^{k_2} \ldots X_l^{k_l}, is equal to an element aa of A; in other words, aa divides 1 in A, hence is invertible in A. Thus, finally, 1−X1j1 - X_1^j and 1−X1mX2n1 - X_1^m X_2^n are relatively prime in A[P]A[P].

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

  • *Commutative Algebra*, Chap. VII, § 3, no. 1, Def. 1 not yet on this site: AC VII
  • *Commutative Algebra*, Chap. VII, § 3, no. 5 not yet on this site: AC VII
  • Commutative Algebra, Chap. VII, § 1, no. 6 not yet on this site: AC VII
Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.