Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 0BTN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0BTN].

General Topology, chapter IV, § 7. Infinite sums and products of real numbers

The theorem of associativity (Chapter III, § 5, no. 3, Theorem 2) remains valid when G is replaced by R‾\overline{\mathbf{R}} and the xix_i are assumed to be ≥0\geq 0. This is clear if ∑i∈Ixi\sum_{i \in I} x_i is finite. Suppose, on the contrary, that ∑i∈Ixi=+∞\sum_{i \in I} x_i = + \infty. Then for each finite a>0a > 0 there is a finite subset H of I such that ∑i∈Hxi≥a\sum_{i \in H} x_i \geq a. Let K be a finite subset of L such that H⊂⋃λ∈KIλH \subset \bigcup_{\lambda \in K} I_\lambda; then since sλ≥∑i∈Iλ∩Hxis_\lambda \geq \sum_{i \in I_\lambda \cap H} x_i for all λ∈K\lambda \in K, we have

∑λ∈Ksλ≥∑i∈Hxi≥a, \sum_{\lambda \in K} s_\lambda \geq \sum_{i \in H} x_i \geq a,
which shows that ∑λ∈Lsλ=+∞\sum_{\lambda \in L} s_\lambda = + \infty. We leave to the reader the task of formulating the analogous proposition for multipliable families of numbers in [0,1][0, 1] or in [1,+∞][1, + \infty].

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.