Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 0C5M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C5M].

General Topology, chapter IX, § 4. Normal spaces

Let uu be a continuous mapping of AA into [−i,+i][ -i, +i ]; then there is a continuous mapping vv of XX into [−i/3,+i/3][ -i/3, +i/3 ], such that ∣u(x)−v(x)∣≤2/3|u(x) - v(x)| \leq 2/3 for all x∈Ax \in A.

Let HH be the set of all x∈Ax \in A such that −i≤u(x)≤−i/3-i \leq u(x) \leq -i/3, and let KK be the set of all x∈Ax \in A such that i/3≤u(x)≤ii/3 \leq u(x) \leq i; HH and KK are closed in AA, and therefore in XX, and do not intersect; hence by (OV)(O_{V}) there is a continuous mapping vv of XX into [−i/3,+i/3][ -i/3, +i/3 ] which is equal to −i/3-i/3 on HH and to +i/3+i/3 on KK. The mapping vv satisfies the conditions of the lemma.

We now define the functions gng_{n} by induction. Applying the lemma with u=fu = f, we define g0g_{0} to be a continuous mapping of XX into [−i/3,+i/3][ -i/3, +i/3 ] such that ∣f(x)−g0(x)∣≤2/3|f(x) - g_{0}(x)| \leq 2/3 for all x∈Ax \in A. Suppose now that a continuous mapping gng_{n} of XX into the interval

[−i+(23)n+1,i−(23)n+1] [-i + (\frac{2}{3})^{n+1}, i - (\frac{2}{3})^{n+1}]

has been defined, such that ∣f(x)−gn(x)∣≤(23)n+1|f(x) - g_{n}(x)| \leq (\frac{2}{3})^{n+1} for all x∈Ax \in A. Applying the lemma to the function u(x)=(23)n+1(f(x)−gn(x))u(x) = (\frac{2}{3})^{n+1} (f(x) - g_{n}(x)), we see that there exists a continuous mapping hn+1h_{n+1} of XX into the interval

[−2n+13n+2,2n+13n+2] \left[ -\frac{2^{n+1}}{3^{n+2}}, \frac{2^{n+1}}{3^{n+2}} \right]

such that

∣f(x)−gn(x)−hn+1(x)∣≤(2/3)n+2 |f(x) - g_{n}(x) - h_{n+1}(x)| \leq (2/3)^{n+2}

for all x∈Ax \in A; the induction is completed by taking gn+1=gn+hn+1g_{n+1} = g_{n} + h_{n+1}, since this function satisfies the inequality ∣gn+1(x)∣≤1−(2/3)n+2|g_{n+1}(x)| \leq 1 - (2/3)^{n+2} for all x∈Xx \in X, by virtue of the definition of hn+1h_{n+1}.

From this definition it follows that, for m≥pm \geq p and n≥pn \geq p, we have

∣gm(x)−gn(x)∣≤2p+13p+2∑k=0∞(2/3)k=(2/3)p+1 |g_{m}(x) - g_{n}(x)| \leq \frac{2^{p+1}}{3^{p+2}} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (2/3)^{k} = (2/3)^{p+1}

at each point x∈Xx \in X; hence the sequence (gn(x))(g_n(x)) is a Cauchy sequence for each x∈Xx \in X, and therefore converges to a point g(x)g(x) of the interval [−1,+1][ -1, +1 ]; and since f(x)−gn(x)f(x) - g_n(x) tends to 0 for all x∈Ax \in A as n→∞n \to \infty, gg is an extension of ff to XX. It remains therefore only to show that gg is continuous on XX.

Now let xx be any point of XX; then, given any ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists an integer n0n_0 such that ∣gm(y)−gn(y)∣≤ε|g_m(y) - g_n(y)| \leq \varepsilon for all y∈Xy \in X and all m≥n0m \geq n_0 and all n≥n0n \geq n_0; hence, letting mm tend to +∞+\infty, we have

∣g(y)−gn(y)∣≤ε. |g(y) - g_n(y)| \leq \varepsilon.

Let VV be a neighbourhood of xx such that ∣gn(y)−gn(x)∣≤ε|g_n(y) - g_n(x)| \leq \varepsilon for all y∈Vy \in V; then, for each y∈Vy \in V we shall have

∣g(y)−g(x)∣≤∣g(y)−gn(y)∣+∣gn(y)−gn(x)∣+∣g(x)−gn(x)∣≤3ε, |g(y) - g(x)| \leq |g(y) - g_n(y)| + |g_n(y) - g_n(x)| + |g(x) - g_n(x)| \leq 3\varepsilon,

which shows that gg is continuous at xx, and completes the proof of Theorem 2. (The last part of the proof uses, in a particular case, the idea of uniform convergence, which we shall study in general in Chapter X, no. 1.)

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.