Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 0C5W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0C5W].

General Topology, chapter IX, § 4. Normal spaces

Let A,BA, B be two disjoint closed subsets of a paracompact space XX. If for each x∈Ax \in A there is an open neighbourhood VxV_x of xx and an open neighbourhood WxW_x of BB which do not intersect, then there exists an open neighbourhood TT of AA and an open neighbourhood UU of BB which do not intersect.

Assuming the truth of this lemma for the moment, we can apply it to the case where BB consists of a single point, because XX is Hausdorff, and it shows then that XX is regular. We can then apply Lemma 2 again to any two disjoint closed subsets of XX, and this shows that Axiom (OV′)(O'_V) is satisfied.

To prove the lemma, consider the open covering of XX consisting of CACA and the VxV_x, where x∈Ax \in A; let (Ti)i∈I(T_i)_{i \in I} be a locally finite open refinement of this covering. Then, by definition, if A∩Ti≠∅A \cap T_i \neq \emptyset there exists xi∈Ax_i \in A such that Ti⊂VxiT_i \subset V_{x_i}. Let TT be the open set which is the union of the TiT_i which meet AA, and let us show that there is an open neighbourhood UU of BB which does not meet TT. For each y∈By \in B there is an open neighbourhood SyS_y of yy which meets only a finite number of sets TiT_i; let JJ be the finite subset of II consisting of those indices ii such that TiT_i meets both SyS_y and AA; if we put Uy=Sy∩⋂i∈JWxiU_y = S_y \cap \bigcap_{i \in J} W_{x_i}, then UyU_y is an open neighbourhood of yy which meets none of the TiT_i which meet AA, and hence Uy∩T=∅U_y \cap T = \emptyset. Let U=⋃y∈BUyU = \bigcup_{y \in B} U_y; then U′U' is an open neighbourhood of BB which does not meet TT, and the lemma is proved.

There exist normal spaces which are not paracompact (Exercise 19).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.