Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 0CAA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CAA].

General Topology, chapter IX, Appendix 0. Infinite products in normed algebras

Let AA be a complete normed algebra. If (un)(u_n) is an absolutely convergent series of elements of AA, then the sequence (e+un)(e + u_n) is multipliable in AA; and if all the elements e+une + u_n are units in AA, then so is ∏n∈N(e+un)\prod_{n \in \mathbf{N}} (e + u_n).

Let us apply the criterion of Theorem 1. For every finite subset LL of N\mathbf{N}, we have pL−e=∏n∈L(e+un)−e=∑M(∏n∈Mun)p_L - e = \prod_{n \in L} (e + u_n) - e = \sum_M \left( \prod_{n \in M} u_n \right), where MM runs through the set of all non-empty subsets of LL (linearly ordered by the induced ordering). Since ∏n∈Mun≤∏n∈M∣un∣\prod_{n \in M} u_n \leq \prod_{n \in M} |u_n|, we may write

∣∣p1−e∣∣=∑M(∏n∈Mun)⋅∏i∈I(1+∣ui∣)−1. ||p_1 - e|| = \sum_M (\prod_{n \in M} u_n) \cdot \prod_{i \in I} (1 + |u_i|) - 1.

Now since the series whose general term is ∣un∣|u_n| is convergent by hypothesis, the sequence 1−∣un∣1 - |u_n| is multipliable in R+∗\mathbf{R}_+^* (Chapter IV, § 7, no. 4, Theorem 4). Hence for each ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists a finite subset J0J_0 of N\mathbf{N} such that, for every finite subset LL of N\mathbf{N} which does not meet J0J_0, we have ∣∏n∈L(1+∣∣un∣∣)−1∣≤ε\left| \prod_{n \in L} (1 + ||u_n||) - 1 \right| \leq \varepsilon; hence the result.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.