Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 0CA6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CA6].

General Topology, chapter IX, Appendix 0. Infinite products in normed algebras

Let (x_n)_{n \in \mathbf{N}} be a sequence of points in a complete normed algebra A. a) If (x_n) is multipliable and if its product is a unit of A, then for each ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there exists a finite subset J_0 of \mathbf{N} such that, for every finite subset L of \mathbf{N} which does not meet J_0, we have ∥e−pL∥≤ε\|e - p_L\| \leq \varepsilon. b) Conversely, if the sequence (x_n) satisfies this condition, it is multipliable. Moreover, if each x_n is a unit, then ∏n∈Nxn\prod_{n \in \mathbf{N}} x_n is a unit.

a) Let p be the product of the multipliable sequence (x_n), and suppose that p is a unit in A; then (Chapter IX, § 3, no. 7, Proposition 13) there exist α>0\alpha > 0 and a>0a > 0 such that, for all y∈Ay \in A for which we have

∥y−p∥≤α, \|y - p\| \leq \alpha,
y is a unit and ∥y−1∥≤a\|y^{-1}\| \leq a. By hypothesis, for every ε\varepsilon such that 0<ε<α0 < \varepsilon < \alpha, there is a finite subset H_0 of \mathbf{N} such that, for every finite subset H of \mathbf{N} containing H_0, we have ∥pH−p∥≤ε\|p_H - p\| \leq \varepsilon. Let J0=[0,m]J_0 = [0, m] be an interval of \mathbf{N} which contains H_0; for each finite subset L of \mathbf{N} which does not meet J_0, the integers belonging to L are all greater than those belonging to H_0; hence, if H=H0∪LH = H_0 \cup L, we have pH=pH0pLp_H = p_{H_0} p_L. Now, since ∥pH0−p∥≤ε≤α\|p_{H_0} - p\| \leq \varepsilon \leq \alpha, pH0p_{H_0} is a unit, and
∥e−pH0−1p∥≤ε∥pH0−1p∥≤aε; \|e - p_{H_0}^{-1} p\| \leq \varepsilon \|p_{H_0}^{-1} p\| \leq a \varepsilon;
since ∥pH0pL−p∥≤ε\|p_{H_0} p_L - p\| \leq \varepsilon, we deduce
∥pL−pH0−1p∥≤ε∥pH0−1∥≤aε, \|p_L - p_{H_0}^{-1} p\| \leq \varepsilon \|p_{H_0}^{-1}\| \leq a \varepsilon,
and finally ∥e−pL∥≤2aε\|e - p_L\| \leq 2a \varepsilon.

b) Suppose that, for each ε>0\varepsilon > 0, there exists a finite subset J_0 of \mathbf{N} such that, for every finite subset L of \mathbf{N} which does not meet J_0, we have ∥e−pL∥≤ε\|e - p_L\| \leq \varepsilon. Let H0=[0,p]H_0 = [0, p] be an interval of \mathbf{N} which contains J_0; then every finite subset H of \mathbf{N} which contains H_0 can be written in the form H0∪LH_0 \cup L, where the integers in L are all greater than those in H_0; hence we have pH=pH0pLp_H = p_{H_0} p_L, and since L does not meet J0J_0, ∥pH−pH0∥≤ε∥pH0∥\|p_H - p_{H_0}\| \leq \varepsilon \|p_{H_0}\|, and consequently ∥pH∥=(1+ε)∥pH0∥\|p_H\| = (1 + \varepsilon)\|p_{H_0}\|. If pH0=0p_{H_0} = 0, the sequence (xn)(x_n) is evidently multipliable and its product is 0; excluding this trivial case, there is an interval H1=[0,q]H_1 = [0, q] containing H0H_0 and such that, for every finite subset LL of N\mathbf{N} which does not meet H1H_1, we have ∥e−pL∥≤ε(∥pH0∥)−1\|e - p_L\| \leq \varepsilon (\|p_{H_0}\|)^{-1}. As above, it follows that, for each finite subset H⊃H1H \supset H_1,

∥pH−pH1∥≤(∥pH0∥)−1∥pH1∥ε≤ε(1+ε). \|p_H - p_{H_1}\| \leq (\|p_{H_0}\|)^{-1}\|p_{H_1}\|\varepsilon \leq \varepsilon (1 + \varepsilon).

Cauchy’s criterion therefore shows that J→pJJ \to p_J has a limit in AA with respect to the directed set F(N)\mathfrak{F}(\mathbf{N}).

If all the xnx_n are units, then so are all the finite partial products pJp_J; hence for each finite subset HH containing H0H_0 we have

∥e−pH0−1pH∥≤ε, \|e - p_{H_0}^{-1}p_H\| \leq \varepsilon,

and this shows that, in the multiplicative group GG of units of AA, the image under the mapping J→pJJ \to p_J of the section filter of F(N)\mathfrak{F}(\mathbf{N}) is a Cauchy filter base with respect to the left uniformity of GG; but since GG is complete (Chapter IX, § 3, no. 7, Proposition 13), the limit of the mapping J→pJJ \to p_J belongs to GG.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.