Let G be the group of units of a complete normed algebra A. Then G is an open subset of A; the topology induced on G by the topology of A is compatible with the group structure of G; and G, endowed with this topology, is a complete group (with respect to each of its two uniformities).
The corollary to Proposition 12 shows that G contains a neighbourhood V of e in A; hence, for each x0∈G, the elements of x0V are units, and x0V is a neighbourhood of x0 in A, since x↦x0x is a homeomorphism of A onto itself (x0 being a unit of A). Hence G is open in A.
To show that the topology induced on G by the topology of A is compatible with the group structure of G, it is sufficient to show that the function x−1 is continuous on G. Let x0∈G, and for each x∈G, write x in the form x=x0(e+u), so that u=x0−1(x−x0); then ∣∣u∣∣≤∣∣x0−1∣∣⋅∣∣x−x0∣∣, and thus if ∣∣x−x0∣∣≤1/∣∣x0−1∣∣, we have ∣∣u∣∣≤1, e+u=x0−1x is a unit, the series whose general term is (−1)nun is absolutely convergent, and
As x tends to x0, ∣∣x−x0∣∣ tends to 0, and since
n=0∑∞(−1)nun≤∣∣e∣∣+1−∣∣u∣∣∣∣u∣∣
remains bounded, it follows that x−1 tends to x0−1.
Finally, to show that the left uniformity of G is complete, let us show that every Cauchy filter F~ with respect to this uniformity is a Cauchy filter with respect to the additive uniformity of A and converges to a point of G. For each ε such that 0<ε<1, there is a set M∈F such that ∣∣x−1y−e∣∣≤ε for all x,y in M, i.e., such that
∣∣y−x∣∣≤ε∣∣x∣∣.
Let a be a point of M; for each x∈M we have ∣∣x−a∣∣≤ε∣∣a∣∣, and therefore ∣∣x∣∣≤(1+ε)∣∣a∣∣. On the other hand, there exists a set N⊂M belonging to F and such that ∣∣x−1y−e∣∣≤ε/(1+ε)∣∣a∣∣ for all x and y in N; it follows that ∣∣y−x∣∣≤ε∣∣x∣∣/(1+ε)∣∣a∣∣≤ε, which shows that F is a Cauchy filter with respect to the additive uniformity of A, and therefore converges to a point x0, since A is complete. Since x0 is the limit of F, we have ∣∣x−1x0−e∣∣≤ε for all x∈M by the principle of extension of inequalities; since ε>1, it follows that x−1x0 is a unit in A; hence x0 is a unit, i.e., x0∈G.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.