Proposition 4
Tag 0CWO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CWO].
Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 2. Anneaux de Cohen
Let and be two -rings such that , and let (resp. ) be the canonical homomorphism of (resp. ) onto (resp. ). Let (resp. ) be a family of elements of (resp. ) whose image under (resp. ) is a -basis of (resp. ). Let be an isomorphism of onto such that for every . Then there exists a unique homomorphism of into , such that and for every . It is surjective. If , it is an isomorphism.
Let us prove the existence of . Let be the subring of formed by the pairs such that . The mapping is a surjective homomorphism of rings from A onto . Its kernel , equal to , is therefore a maximal ideal of A. The topological subspace A of is closed in , hence complete, and the topology induced on A by that of is the -adic topology. Hence A is a separated complete local ring with maximal ideal (III, § 2, No. 13, Prop. 19). For every , we have by hypothesis; if is the class of modulo , the family is a -basis of the field . By theorem 1 of No. 2, there exists a Cohen subring of A, and only one, containing for every . We have . The restriction to of the projection of onto C is a homomorphism which induces an isomorphism of onto . By Prop. 2, c) of No. 2, is an isomorphism of onto C. One sees analogously that the restriction to of the projection of onto is a surjective homomorphism of onto . Hence, is the graph of a surjective homomorphism of C onto , and one obviously has , for every . Moreover, if , is an isomorphism.
Let us prove the uniqueness of . Let be a homomorphism of C into such that and for every , and let be the graph of . It is immediate that is a Cohen subring of A, containing for every , whence (theorem 1 of No. 2) and finally .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.