Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 0CWO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CWO].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 2. Anneaux de Cohen

Let CC and C′C' be two pp-rings such that l(C)⩾l(C′)l(C) \geqslant l(C'), and let π\pi (resp. π′\pi') be the canonical homomorphism of CC (resp. C′C') onto κC\kappa_C (resp. κC′\kappa_{C'}). Let (xλ)λ∈Λ(x_\lambda)_{\lambda \in \Lambda} (resp. (xλ′)λ∈Λ(x'_\lambda)_{\lambda \in \Lambda}) be a family of elements of CC (resp. C′C') whose image under π\pi (resp. π′\pi') is a pp-basis of κC\kappa_C (resp. κC′\kappa_{C'}). Let vv be an isomorphism of κC\kappa_C onto κC′\kappa_{C'} such that v(π(xλ))=π′(xλ′)v(\pi(x_\lambda)) = \pi'(x'_\lambda) for every λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda. Then there exists a unique homomorphism uu of CC into C′C', such that v∘π=π′∘uv \circ \pi = \pi' \circ u and u(xλ)=xλ′u(x_\lambda) = x'_\lambda for every λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda. It is surjective. If l(C)=l(C′)l(C) = l(C'), it is an isomorphism.

Let us prove the existence of uu. Let AA be the subring of C×C′C \times C' formed by the pairs (x,x′)(x, x') such that v(π(x))=π′(x′)v(\pi(x)) = \pi'(x'). The mapping (x,x′)↦π(x)(x, x') \mapsto \pi(x) is a surjective homomorphism of rings from A onto κC\kappa_C. Its kernel mm, equal to pC×pC′pC \times pC', is therefore a maximal ideal of A. The topological subspace A of C×C′C \times C' is closed in C×C′C \times C', hence complete, and the topology induced on A by that of C×C′C \times C' is the mm-adic topology. Hence A is a separated complete local ring with maximal ideal mm (III, § 2, No. 13, Prop. 19). For every λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda, we have (xλ,xλ′)∈A(x_\lambda, x'_\lambda) \in A by hypothesis; if ξλ\xi_\lambda is the class of (xλ,xλ′)(x_\lambda, x'_\lambda) modulo mm, the family (ξλ)λ∈Λ(\xi_\lambda)_{\lambda \in \Lambda} is a pp-basis of the field A/mA/m. By theorem 1 of No. 2, there exists a Cohen subring C′′C'' of A, and only one, containing (xλ,xλ′)(x_\lambda, x'_\lambda) for every λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda. We have l(C′′)=l(C)≥l(C′)l(C'') = l(C) \geq l(C'). The restriction to C′′C'' of the projection of C×C′C \times C' onto C is a homomorphism h:C′′→Ch : C'' \to C which induces an isomorphism of κC′′\kappa_{C''} onto κC\kappa_C. By Prop. 2, c) of No. 2, hh is an isomorphism of C′′C'' onto C. One sees analogously that the restriction h′h' to C′′C'' of the projection of C×C′C \times C' onto C′C' is a surjective homomorphism of C′′C'' onto C′C'. Hence, C′′C'' is the graph of a surjective homomorphism u=h′∘h−1u = h' \circ h^{-1} of C onto C′C', and one obviously has v∘π=π′∘uv \circ \pi = \pi' \circ u, u(xλ)=xλ′u(x_\lambda) = x'_\lambda for every λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda. Moreover, if l(C)=l(C′)l(C) = l(C'), uu is an isomorphism.

Let us prove the uniqueness of uu. Let u1u_1 be a homomorphism of C into C′C' such that v∘π=π′∘u1v \circ \pi = \pi' \circ u_1 and u1(xλ)=xλ′u_1(x_\lambda) = x'_\lambda for every λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda, and let C1C_1 be the graph of u1u_1. It is immediate that C1C_1 is a Cohen subring of A, containing (xλ,xλ′)(x_\lambda, x'_\lambda) for every λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda, whence C1=C′′C_1 = C'' (theorem 1 of No. 2) and finally u1=uu_1 = u.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.