Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 0CWV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CWV].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 2. Anneaux de Cohen

Let us retain the hypotheses and notations of th. 2. There exists a unique multiplicative subset S of A such that π\pi induces a bijection of S onto k. In order that an element a of A belong to S, it is necessary and sufficient that for every n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}, there exist an element ana_n of A such that a=anpna = a_n^{p^n}. The set S is the set of elements of the form u(x,0,0,...)u(x, 0, 0, ...).

Let us first prove the uniqueness of S. Let S be a multiplicative subset of A, such that π\pi induces a bijection of S onto k. Let T be the set of elements of A which are pnp^n-th powers for every n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}.

a) One has S⊂TS \subset T : Let a∈Sa \in S and n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}; since the field k is perfect, there exists an element xnx_n of k such that xnpn=π(a)x_n^{p^n} = \pi(a); since one has π(S)=k\pi(S) = k, there exists an element ana_n of S such that xn=π(an)x_n = \pi(a_n). One then has π(anpn)=π(a)\pi(a_n^{p^n}) = \pi(a) whence anpn=aa_n^{p^n} = a since the restriction of π\pi to S is injective.

b) The restriction of π\pi to T is injective: let a and b be two elements of T such that π(a)=π(b)\pi(a) = \pi(b). Let n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}; there exist two elements ana_n and bnb_n of A such that a=anpn,b=bnpna = a_n^{p^n}, b = b_n^{p^n}. We then have π(an)pn=π(bn)pn\pi(a_n)^{p^n} = \pi(b_n)^{p^n}, whence π(an)=π(bn)\pi(a_n) = \pi(b_n), that is to say an≡bna_n \equiv b_n mod. mAm_A. By Lemma 1 of § 1, No. 1, we have anpn≡bnpna_n^{p^n} \equiv b_n^{p^n} mod. mAn+1m_A^{n+1} that is to say a≡ba \equiv b mod. mAn+1m_A^{n+1}. Since n is arbitrary, we have a=ba = b.

Properties a) and b) above, together with the formula π(S)=k\pi(S) = k, imply the relation S=TS = T, whence uniqueness.

Let us now prove the existence of S. With the notation of Theorem 2, put φ=u∘τk\varphi = u \circ \tau_k, that is to say (§ 1, No. 6)

(2)

φ(x)=u(x,0,0,...) \varphi(x) = u(x, 0, 0, ...)
for every x∈kx \in k. By Proposition 4 of loc. cit., we have

(3)

φ(1)=1,φ(xy)=φ(x)φ(y) for x,y in k. \varphi(1) = 1,\quad \varphi(xy) = \varphi(x) \varphi(y) \text{ for } x, y \text{ in } k.

It is clear that the mapping π∘φ\pi \circ \varphi is the identity mapping of kk. Therefore the image S of φ\varphi satisfies the conditions of Proposition 7.

The elements of S are often called the multiplicative (or Teichmüller) representatives of A.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.