Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 0CX1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CX1].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 2. Anneaux de Cohen

a) There exists a unique homomorphism v:B→Av : B \to A extending uu and mapping TiT_i to tit_i for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n.

b) In order that vv be surjective, it is necessary and sufficient that the sequence (u(p1),...,u(pm),t1,...,tn)(u(p_1), ..., u(p_m), t_1, ..., t_n) generate the ideal mAm_A of AA, or again that the classes of these elements modulo mA2m_A^2 generate mA/mA2m_A/m_A^2 as a vector space over the field κA\kappa_A.

c) In order that vv make AA into a finite BB-algebra, it is necessary and sufficient that the sequence (u(p1),...,u(pm),t1,...,tn)(u(p_1), ..., u(p_m), t_1, ..., t_n) generate an ideal of definition of (the mAm_A-adic topology of) AA.

Let nn denote the ideal of the ring BB generated by T1,...,TnT_1, ..., T_n. Every homomorphism vv of BB into AA extending uu and such that v(Ti)=tiv(T_i) = t_i maps nn into mAm_A, and is therefore continuous when BB is endowed with the nn-adic topology. The existence and uniqueness of vv then result from A, IV, p. 26, Prop. 4.

The ring B=C[[T1,...,Tn]]B = C[[T_1, ..., T_n]] is a complete noetherian local ring (III, § 2, No. 10, Corollary 6 to Theorem 2 and No. 6, Proposition 6), whose maximal ideal mBm_B is generated by p1,...,pm,T1,...,Tnp_1, ..., p_m, T_1, ..., T_n. Hence v(mB)⊂mAv(m_B) \subset m_A and vv defines a homomorphism gr(v)(v) of gr⁡(B)=⨁n=0∞mBn/mBn+1\operatorname{gr}(B) = \bigoplus_{n=0}^\infty m_B^n/m_B^{n+1} into gr⁡(A)=⨁n=0∞mAn/mAn+1\operatorname{gr}(A) = \bigoplus_{n=0}^\infty m_A^n/m_A^{n+1}. Now the ring gr⁡(A)\operatorname{gr}(A) is generated by A/mA=κAA/m_A = \kappa_A and mA/mA2m_A/m_A^2, gr(v)(v) induces an isomorphism of κB=κC\kappa_B = \kappa_C onto κA\kappa_A, and the classes modulo mB2m_B^2 of the elements p1,...,pm,T1,...,Tnp_1, ..., p_m, T_1, ..., T_n generate mB/mB2m_B/m_B^2 as a vector space over κB\kappa_B; moreover vv is surjective if and only if gr(v)(v) is surjective (III, § 2, No. 8, Corollary 2 to Theorem 1). This proves bb.

The ideal of AA generated by the sequence (u(p1),...,u(pm),t1,...,tn)(u(p_1), ..., u(p_m), t_1, ..., t_n) is none other than v(mB)v(m_B) AA. Since mAm_A contains v(mB)v(m_B), AA is a Zariski ring for the v(mB)v(m_B) AA-adic topology. The ring A/v(mB)A/v(m_B) AA is artinian if and only if its length as an AA-module is finite. But since every simple module over AA is annihilated by mAm_A and since, by hypothesis, A/mAA/m_A and B/mBB/m_B are isomorphic, this occurs if and only if the dimension over the field B/mBB/m_B of the vector space A/v(mB)A/v(m_B) AA is finite. By IV, § 2, No. 5, Corollary 2 of Proposition 9, we see therefore that v(mB)v(m_B) AA is an ideal of definition of AA if and only if the dimension of A/v(mB)A/v(m_B) AA over B/mBB/m_B is finite. This is indeed the case if AA is a finite BB-algebra.

Suppose that v(mB)v(m_B) AA is an ideal of definition of AA. The mBm_B-adic topology of the BB-module AA then coincides with the mAm_A-adic topology of the ring AA, and is therefore separated. Since A/v(mB)A/v(m_B) AA is a finitely generated module over B/mBB/m_B, AA is a finitely generated BB-module (III, § 2, No. 3, Example 3 and No. 9, cor. 1 of Prop. 12). This proves cc.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.