Lemma 3
Tag 0CX1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CX1].
Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 2. Anneaux de Cohen
a) There exists a unique homomorphism extending and mapping to for .
b) In order that be surjective, it is necessary and sufficient that the sequence generate the ideal of , or again that the classes of these elements modulo generate as a vector space over the field .
c) In order that make into a finite -algebra, it is necessary and sufficient that the sequence generate an ideal of definition of (the -adic topology of) .
Let denote the ideal of the ring generated by . Every homomorphism of into extending and such that maps into , and is therefore continuous when is endowed with the -adic topology. The existence and uniqueness of then result from A, IV, p. 26, Prop. 4.
The ring is a complete noetherian local ring (III, § 2, No. 10, Corollary 6 to Theorem 2 and No. 6, Proposition 6), whose maximal ideal is generated by . Hence and defines a homomorphism gr of into . Now the ring is generated by and , gr induces an isomorphism of onto , and the classes modulo of the elements generate as a vector space over ; moreover is surjective if and only if gr is surjective (III, § 2, No. 8, Corollary 2 to Theorem 1). This proves .
The ideal of generated by the sequence is none other than . Since contains , is a Zariski ring for the -adic topology. The ring is artinian if and only if its length as an -module is finite. But since every simple module over is annihilated by and since, by hypothesis, and are isomorphic, this occurs if and only if the dimension over the field of the vector space is finite. By IV, § 2, No. 5, Corollary 2 of Proposition 9, we see therefore that is an ideal of definition of if and only if the dimension of over is finite. This is indeed the case if is a finite -algebra.
Suppose that is an ideal of definition of . The -adic topology of the -module then coincides with the -adic topology of the ring , and is therefore separated. Since is a finitely generated module over , is a finitely generated -module (III, § 2, No. 3, Example 3 and No. 9, cor. 1 of Prop. 12). This proves .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.