Proposition 1
Tag 0CXL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0CXL].
Commutative Algebra, chapter IX, § 3. Corps de représentants
Let be a field, A a -algebra which is a separated and complete local ring, K a sub--extension of which possesses a separating transcendence basis over (A, V, p. 130, déf. 1). For every , let be a representative of in A. There exists a unique subfield L of A, containing and the elements , and such that the canonical homomorphism from A onto induces an isomorphism of L onto K.
Let be the -homomorphism of the polynomial ring into A which maps onto for every . Let be a nonzero element of ; one has , because the family is algebraically free over in ; consequently, is invertible in the local ring A. It follows that extends to a homomorphism of the field into A. Then A is a -algebra, is an extension of and K a sub-extension of which is algebraic and separable over . It remains to prove that there exists a unique subfield L of A containing and such that .
a) Existence of L: Let S be the set of subfields L of A, containing and such that ; it is inductive for the inclusion relation. Let L be a maximal element of S; we consider K as an extension (algebraic and separable, by A, V, p. 40, prop. 9) of L. Let and let be its minimal polynomial over L. Since is a simple root of P, Hensel's lemma (III, § 4, no. 5, cor. 1 of th. 2) ensures the existence of an element x of A such that and . The subring of A belongs to S; by the maximal character of L, we therefore have , whence . Finally one has .
b) Uniqueness of L: Let L and L’ be two subfields of A containing and such that . Let , and let and be the elements such that . If is the minimal polynomial of over , then is a simple root of P, and one has . By Hensel's lemma (loc. cit.) one has . Therefore .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.