Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 0DBV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DBV].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 9. Modules dualisants

Let ρ:A→B\rho : A \to B be a homomorphism of noetherian rings, making BB into a flat AA-module. Assume that for every maximal ideal nn of BB, the ring κ(ρ−1(n))⊗AB\kappa(\rho^{-1}(n)) \otimes_A B is a Gorenstein ring. Let Ω\Omega be a dualizing AA-module ; the BB-module Ω(B)\Omega_{(B)} is dualizing.

Let nn be a maximal ideal of BB, and pp its inverse image in AA. The ApA_p-module BnB_n is flat, the ApA_p-module Ωp\Omega_p is dualizing, Ω(B)⊗BBn\Omega_{(B)} \otimes_B B_n is identified with Ωp⊗ApBn\Omega_p \otimes_{A_p} B_n and κAp⊗ApBn\kappa_{A_p} \otimes_{A_p} B_n, which is identified with a ring of fractions of κ(p)⊗AB\kappa(p) \otimes_A B, is a Gorenstein ring. It is therefore enough to prove the proposition when ρ\rho is a local homomorphism of local rings, which we shall henceforth assume.

Let us first treat the case where the rings AA and BB are artinian. Put C=B/mABC = B/\mathfrak{m}_A B. Since BB is flat over AA, the BB-module HomB(C,Ω(B))\mathrm{Hom}_B(C, \Omega_{(B)}) is isomorphic to HomA(κA,Ω)⊗AB\mathrm{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, \Omega) \otimes_A B (I, § 2, n° 10, prop. 11), hence to HomA(κA,Ω)⊗κAC\mathrm{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, \Omega) \otimes_{\kappa_A} C. One deduces a sequence of isomorphisms

HomB(κB,Ω(B))⟶HomC(κC,HomB(C,Ω(B)))⟶HomC(κC,HomA(κA,Ω)⊗κAC) \mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_B, \Omega_{(B)}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_C(\kappa_C, \mathrm{Hom}_B(C, \Omega_{(B)})) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_C(\kappa_C, \mathrm{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, \Omega) \otimes_{\kappa_A} C)
⟶HomA(κA,Ω)⊗κAHomC(κC,C). \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, \Omega) \otimes_{\kappa_A} \mathrm{Hom}_C(\kappa_C, C) .

The κA\kappa_A-vector space HomA(κA,Ω)\mathrm{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, \Omega) is of dimension 1 since Ω\Omega is dualizing, and the same holds for the κC\kappa_C-vector space HomC(κC,C)\mathrm{Hom}_C(\kappa_C, C) since CC is a Gorenstein ring; consequently the κB\kappa_B-vector space HomB(κB,Ω(B))\mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_B, \Omega_{(B)}) is of dimension 1.

Let MM be a BB-module of finite length; let us prove by induction on longB(M)\mathrm{long}_B(M) that one has longB(HomB(M,Ω(B)))⩽longB(M)\mathrm{long}_B(\mathrm{Hom}_B(M, \Omega_{(B)})) \leqslant \mathrm{long}_B(M). The assertion is clear if M=0M = 0, and it follows from the preceding if M=κBM = \kappa_B. Suppose longB(M)⩾2\mathrm{long}_B(M) \geqslant 2. There exists an exact sequence of BB-modules

0→M′→M→κB→0 0 \to M' \to M \to \kappa_B \to 0
with longB(M′)<longB(M)\mathrm{long}_B(M') < \mathrm{long}_B(M). One deduces from this an exact sequence
0→HomB(κB,Ω(B))→HomB(M,Ω(B))→HomB(M′,Ω(B)), 0 \to \mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_B, \Omega_{(B)}) \to \mathrm{Hom}_B(M, \Omega_{(B)}) \to \mathrm{Hom}_B(M', \Omega_{(B)}) ,
and one concludes by applying the induction hypothesis to M′M'.

Let NN be the kernel of the canonical surjection of κA⊗AB\kappa_A \otimes_A B onto κB\kappa_B. Put m=longB(κA⊗AB)m = \mathrm{long}_B(\kappa_A \otimes_A B); one has longB(N)=m−1\mathrm{long}_B(N) = m - 1. Consider the exact sequence of BB-modules

0→HomB(κB,Ω(B))⟶HomB(κA⊗AB,Ω(B))⟶HomB(N,Ω(B)) 0 \to \mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_B, \Omega_{(B)}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_A \otimes_A B, \Omega_{(B)}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hom}_B(N, \Omega_{(B)})
⟶ExtB1(κB,Ω(B))⟶ExtB1(κA⊗AB,Ω(B)). \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ext}_B^1(\kappa_B, \Omega_{(B)}) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ext}_B^1(\kappa_A \otimes_A B, \Omega_{(B)}) .

The BB-modules HomB(κA⊗AB,Ω(B))\mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_A \otimes_A B, \Omega_{(B)}) and ExtB1(κA⊗AB,Ω(B))\mathrm{Ext}_B^1(\kappa_A \otimes_A B, \Omega_{(B)}) are respectively isomorphic to HomA(κA,Ω)⊗AB\mathrm{Hom}_A(\kappa_A, \Omega) \otimes_A B and ExtA1(κA,Ω)⊗AB\mathrm{Ext}_A^1(\kappa_A, \Omega) \otimes_A B, that is to say to κA⊗AB\kappa_A \otimes_A B and to 0. The lengths of the BB-modules HomB(κB,Ω(B))\mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_B, \Omega_{(B)}) and HomB(κA⊗AB,Ω(B))\mathrm{Hom}_B(\kappa_A \otimes_A B, \Omega_{(B)}) are 1 and mm, and that of HomB(N,Ω(B))\mathrm{Hom}_B(N, \Omega_{(B)})) is ⩽m−1\leqslant m - 1; one deduces from this that the BB-module ExtB1(κB,Ω(B))\mathrm{Ext}_B^1(\kappa_B, \Omega_{(B)}) is zero. By Prop. 6 of § 3, No. 3, the BB-module Ω(B)\Omega_{(B)} is injective; consequently it is a dualizing module (No. 1, Example 1).

Let us pass to the general case. Put C=κA⊗ABC = \kappa_A \otimes_A B; by hypothesis this is a Gorenstein ring, hence a Macaulay ring (§3,n°7§ 3, n° 7, prop. 10). By prop. 1 of No. 1, AA is a Macaulay ring, and the AA-module Ω\Omega is Macaulay. Hence BB is a Macaulay ring, and the BB-module Ω(B)\Omega_{(B)} is Macaulay (§2,n°7§ 2, n° 7, cor. 1 of prop. 9). Put r=dim⁡(A)r = \dim(A), s=dim⁡(C)s = \dim(C). There exists a sequence (x1,…,xr)(x_1, \ldots, x_r) of elements of mA\mathfrak{m}_A regular for the AA-modules AA and Ω\Omega, and a sequence (y1,…,ys)(y_1, \ldots, y_s) of elements of mB\mathfrak{m}_B regular for the BB-module CC; let xx denote the ideal of AA and g\mathfrak{g} the ideal of BB generated by them respectively. The sequence (y1,…,ys,ρ(x1),…,ρ(xr))(y_1, \ldots, y_s, \rho(x_1), \ldots, \rho(x_r)) is regular for the BB-modules BB and Ω(B)\Omega_{(B)} (§1,n°6§ 1, n° 6, prop. 11), and the AA-module B/gB/\mathfrak{g} is flat (loc. cit., prop. 10). Put A′=A/xA' = A/x, B′=B/(xB+g)B' = B/(xB + \mathfrak{g}) and let ρ′:A′→B′\rho' : A' \to B' denote the homomorphism deduced from ρ\rho by passing to quotients. The rings A′A' and B′B' are artinian, the A′A'-module B′B' is flat, the ring κA′⊗A′B′\kappa_{A'} \otimes_{A'} B', which is identified with C/gC/\mathfrak{g}, is a Gorenstein ring (§3,n°7§ 3, n° 7, example 2) and the A′A'-module Ω(A′)\Omega_{(A')} is dualizing (No. 2, prop. 4). By the first part of the proof, the B′B'-module Ω(B′)\Omega_{(B')} is dualizing. It then follows from loc. cit. that the BB-module Ω(B)\Omega_{(B)} is dualizing.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.