Proposition 6
Tag 0DBX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DBX].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 9. Modules dualisants
*Let be a noetherian local ring and a dualizing -module. Let be a finite -algebra; suppose that the -module is Macaulay. The -module is zero for and dualizing for .
We have (VIII, § 2, No. 3, Theorem 1 c)); let . We have for since the -module is Macaulay (No. 1, Corollary to Proposition 3). Let us prove that the -module is dualizing.
Suppose first that . The spectrum of is finite and formed of maximal ideals (IV, § 2, No. 5, Proposition 9); the canonical mapping is an isomorphism (loc. cit., Corollary 1). The -module is therefore the direct sum of the modules ; since has support in , it identifies with . We have for every ; to prove that the -module is dualizing, it is therefore enough to prove that this is so for the -module for every , which brings us back to the case where the ring is local. In this case, by Example 6 of § 8, No. 5, the -module is isomorphic to , where is a Matlis -module; it is consequently a Matlis -module (§ 8, No. 6, Corollary to Proposition 5), hence a dualizing -module (No. 1, Example 1).
Now suppose that and reason by induction on . We have , whence ; on the other hand we have (No. 1, Proposition 1), and consequently . There therefore exists an element of such that the homotheties and are injective.
Consider the exact sequence of extension modules associated with the exact sequence and with the -module . The -module is Macaulay (, No. 1, Example 3), of dimension (VIII, , No. 2, Proposition 3) ; we therefore have for (No. 1, Corollary to Proposition 3). Since we have for , we obtain an exact sequence of -modules
By the induction hypothesis, the -module is dualizing. Since the -algebra is finite, the image of in is contained in the radical of (V, , No. 1, Proposition 1) ; by Proposition 4 of No. 2, the -module is dualizing.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.