Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0DBX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DBX].

Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 9. Modules dualisants

*Let AA be a noetherian local ring and Ω\Omega a dualizing AA-module. Let BB be a finite AA-algebra; suppose that the AA-module BB is Macaulay. The BB-module ExtAi(B,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(B, \Omega) is zero for i≠dim⁡(A)−dim⁡(B)i \neq \dim(A) - \dim(B) and dualizing for i=dim⁡(A)−dim⁡(B)i = \dim(A) - \dim(B).

We have dim⁡(B)=dim⁡A(B)≤dim⁡(A)\dim(B) = \dim_A(B) \leq \dim(A) (VIII, § 2, No. 3, Theorem 1 c)); let c=dim⁡(A)−dim⁡(B)c = \dim(A) - \dim(B). We have ExtAi(B,Ω)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(B, \Omega) = 0 for i≠ci \neq c since the AA-module BB is Macaulay (No. 1, Corollary to Proposition 3). Let us prove that the BB-module ExtAc(B,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B, \Omega) is dualizing.

Suppose first that dim⁡(B)=0\dim(B) = 0. The spectrum XX of BB is finite and formed of maximal ideals (IV, § 2, No. 5, Proposition 9); the canonical mapping B→∏n∈XBnB \to \prod_{n \in X} B_n is an isomorphism (loc. cit., Corollary 1). The BB-module Ω′=ExtAc(B,Ω)\Omega' = \mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B, \Omega) is therefore the direct sum of the modules ExtAc(Bn,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B_n, \Omega); since ExtAc(Bn,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B_n, \Omega) has support in {n}\{n\}, it identifies with Ωn′\Omega'_n. We have dim⁡(Bn)=0\dim(B_n) = 0 for every nn; to prove that the BB-module Ω′\Omega' is dualizing, it is therefore enough to prove that this is so for the BnB_n-module ExtAc(Bn,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B_n, \Omega) for every n∈Xn \in X, which brings us back to the case where the ring BB is local. In this case, by Example 6 of § 8, No. 5, the BB-module ExtAc(B,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B, \Omega) is isomorphic to HomA(B,I)\mathrm{Hom}_A(B, I), where II is a Matlis AA-module; it is consequently a Matlis BB-module (§ 8, No. 6, Corollary to Proposition 5), hence a dualizing BB-module (No. 1, Example 1).

Now suppose that dim⁡(B)>0\dim(B) > 0 and reason by induction on dim⁡(B)\dim(B). We have profA(B)=dim⁡A(B)=dim⁡(B)\mathrm{prof}_A(B) = \dim_A(B) = \dim(B), whence profA(B)>0\mathrm{prof}_A(B) > 0; on the other hand we have prof(A)=dim⁡(A)>0\mathrm{prof}(A) = \dim(A) > 0 (No. 1, Proposition 1), and consequently profA(A⊕B)>0\mathrm{prof}_A(A \oplus B) > 0. There therefore exists an element xx of mA\mathfrak{m}_A such that the homotheties xAx_A and xBx_B are injective.

Consider the exact sequence of extension modules associated with the exact sequence 0→B→xBB⟶B/xB→00 \to B \xrightarrow{x_B} B \longrightarrow B/xB \to 0 and with the AA-module Ω\Omega. The AA-module B/xBB/xB is Macaulay (§2§ 2, No. 1, Example 3), of dimension dim⁡(B)−1\dim(B) - 1 (VIII, §3§ 3, No. 2, Proposition 3) ; we therefore have ExtAi(B/xB,Ω)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(B/xB, \Omega) = 0 for i≠c+1i \neq c + 1 (No. 1, Corollary to Proposition 3). Since we have ExtAi(B,Ω)=0\mathrm{Ext}_A^i(B, \Omega) = 0 for i≠ci \neq c, we obtain an exact sequence of BB-modules

0→ExtAc(B,Ω)→xExtAc(B,Ω)⟶ExtAc+1(B/xB,Ω)→0. 0 \to \mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B, \Omega) \xrightarrow{x} \mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B, \Omega) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Ext}_A^{c+1}(B/xB, \Omega) \to 0 .

By the induction hypothesis, the B/xBB/xB-module ExtAc+1(B/xB,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^{c+1}(B/xB, \Omega) is dualizing. Since the AA-algebra BB is finite, the image of mAm_A in BB is contained in the radical of BB (V, §2§ 2, No. 1, Proposition 1) ; by Proposition 4 of No. 2, the BB-module ExtAc(B,Ω)\mathrm{Ext}_A^c(B, \Omega) is dualizing.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Translated with machine help, not yet reviewed by a person.