Proposition 9
Tag 0DC9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DC9].
Commutative Algebra, chapter X, § 9. Modules dualisants
Let B be the integral closure of A, and . Suppose that B is a finitely generated A-module. One has the inequality in . For there to be equality, it is necessary and sufficient that A be a Gorenstein ring.
One has , so that the inequality under consideration is equivalent to .
A) For every maximal ideal of A, the integral closure of is (V, § 1, No. 5, cor. 1), and one has . Moreover, by definition, one has and . This reduces us to proving the proposition when the ring A is local, which we shall henceforth assume. In this case the ordered group identifies canonically with , in such a way that the class of a module of finite length is its length. The ring B is semilocal and the B-module is free of rank 1 (II, § 5, No. 3, prop. 5).
B) If A is a Gorenstein ring, the A-module is free of rank 1 (No. 4, cor. 1 of prop. 7); let us choose a generator of . One has and , and consequently .
C) Suppose the residue field is infinite. For every maximal ideal of B, let denote the -vector space (of dimension 1) , and the canonical projection of onto . Let be the restriction to of the canonical homomorphism . The image of is a -vector subspace of ; it is not contained in , for otherwise one would have and consequently , which is contradictory. Thus the image of is not contained in the union of the (A, V, p. 40, lemma 1); there therefore exists an element of whose image in is non-zero for every , which implies that generates the B-module (II, § 3, No. 3, prop. 11).
Let ; if belong to , one has , hence , which implies that . The mapping therefore induces an injection of into ; consequently one has .
If , one has . One may suppose that the ideal is contained in (otherwise is equal to , hence is a Gorenstein ring). Since is contained in , it follows from Nakayama's lemma that generates . Thus the -module is monogenous, hence free of rank 1, which means that is a Gorenstein ring (No. 4, cor. 1 of prop. 7).
D) Let us treat the general case. Let us denote by the ring , that is to say (IX, App., No. 2) the local ring of the polynomial ring at the prime ideal ; it is a flat, integral -algebra of dimension 1, whose residue field is identified with and whose field of fractions is identified with (loc. cit.). By the corollary to proposition 5 of No. 3, the -module is dualizing. Put ; this is the integral closure of in (V, § 1, No. 3, proposition 13 and No. 5, proposition 16). The conductor is equal to (I, § 2, No. 10, formula (11)). For every -module of finite length, one has : in fact, since the -algebra is flat, it is enough to prove this relation when is simple, that is to say isomorphic to ; but in this case is identified with , whence our assertion. Thus one has
The ring satisfies the hypotheses of the proposition, and its residue field is infinite. By part C) of the proof, one has , and equality implies that is a Gorenstein ring; but this last condition implies that is a Gorenstein ring (§ 3, No. 8, corollary 1 to proposition 12).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.