1) If P=sk, then P∗(f)=(−1)kak. \ 2) Let g be a polynomial in A[X] and put
P(X1,...,Xn)=g(X1)...g(Xn). Then
P∗(f) is just the resultant
res(f,g), by Cor. 1 of IV, p. 80. 3) Put
A(X1,...,Xn)=∏i<j(Xi−Xj)2, then
Δ∗(f) is just the discriminant of the monic polynomial
f (IV, p. 82, formula (46)). \*
4) Put P(X1,…,Xn)=X1k+…+Xnk; moreover, define the algebra E=A[X]/(f) and write x for the image of X in E. We recall that the A-module E is free, with basis (1,x,…,xn−1) (IV, p. 11, Cor.). Let us show
TrE/A(xk)=P∗(f)
Put πk=TrE/A(xk) for every integer k≥1. Bearing in mind Newton's relations (IV, p. 70) we need only establish the relations
πk+a1πk−1+⋯+ak−1π1+kak=0for 1≤k≤nπk+a1πk−1+⋯+an−1πk−n+1+anπk−n=0for k>n
(which we shall also call « Newton's relations »). The relation (27) is clear, because the left-hand side is the trace of
xk−n(xn+a1xn−1+⋯+an−1x+an)=0.
Suppose that 1≤k≤n and put
y=xk+a1xk−1+⋯+ak−1x+ak⋅1;
let M=(mij) be the matrix of the linear mapping u↦yu in E relative to the basis (x′)0,…,n. We easily obtain the relations
mii=akfor 0≤i<n−kmii=0for n−k≤i<n,
whence
TrE/A(y)=i=0∑n−1mii=(n−k)ak.
Moreover we have
TrE/A(y)=πk+a1πk−1+⋯+ak−1π1+nak,
whence formula (26) follows.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.