Bourbaki

Examples

Tag 0DHL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DHL].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 6. Symmetric functions

1) If P=skP = s_k, then P∗(f)=(−1)kakP^*(f) = (-1)^k a_k. \ 2) Let g be a polynomial in A[X]A[X] and put

P(X1,...,Xn)=g(X1)...g(Xn). P(X_1, ..., X_n) = g(X_1) ... g(X_n) .
Then P∗(f)P^*(f) is just the resultant res⁡(f,g)\operatorname{res}(f, g), by Cor. 1 of IV, p. 80. 3) Put A(X1,...,Xn)=∏i<j(Xi−Xj)2A(X_1, ..., X_n) = \prod_{i < j} (X_i - X_j)^2, then Δ∗(f)\Delta^*(f) is just the discriminant of the monic polynomial ff (IV, p. 82, formula (46)). \*

4) Put P(X1,…,Xn)=X1k+…+XnkP(X_1, \ldots, X_n) = X_1^k + \ldots + X_n^k; moreover, define the algebra E=A[X]/(f)E = A[X]/(f) and write xx for the image of XX in EE. We recall that the AA-module EE is free, with basis (1,x,…,xn−1)(1, x, \ldots, x^{n-1}) (IV, p. 11, Cor.). Let us show

TrE/A(xk)=P∗(f) \text{Tr}_{E/A}(x^k) = P^*(f)

Put πk=TrE/A(xk)\pi_k = \text{Tr}_{E/A}(x^k) for every integer k≥1k \geq 1. Bearing in mind Newton's relations (IV, p. 70) we need only establish the relations

πk+a1πk−1+⋯+ak−1π1+kak=0for 1≤k≤nπk+a1πk−1+⋯+an−1πk−n+1+anπk−n=0for k>n \begin{align*} &\pi_k + a_1 \pi_{k-1} + \cdots + a_{k-1} \pi_1 + k a_k = 0 \quad \text{for } 1 \leq k \leq n \\ &\pi_k + a_1 \pi_{k-1} + \cdots + a_{n-1} \pi_{k-n+1} + a_n \pi_{k-n} = 0 \quad \text{for } k > n \end{align*}

(which we shall also call « Newton's relations »). The relation (27) is clear, because the left-hand side is the trace of

xk−n(xn+a1xn−1+⋯+an−1x+an)=0. x^{k-n}(x^n + a_1 x^{n-1} + \cdots + a_{n-1} x + a_n) = 0 .

Suppose that 1≤k≤n1 \leq k \leq n and put

y=xk+a1xk−1+⋯+ak−1x+ak⋅1; y = x^k + a_1 x^{k-1} + \cdots + a_{k-1} x + a_k \cdot 1 ;

let M=(mij)M = (m_{ij}) be the matrix of the linear mapping u↦yuu \mapsto yu in EE relative to the basis (x′)0,…,n(x')_{0,\ldots,n}. We easily obtain the relations

mii=akfor 0≤i<n−kmii=0for n−k≤i<n, \begin{align*} &m_{ii} = a_k \quad \text{for } 0 \leq i < n - k \\ &m_{ii} = 0 \quad \text{for } n - k \leq i < n , \end{align*}

whence

TrE/A(y)=∑i=0n−1mii=(n−k)ak. \text{Tr}_{E/A}(y) = \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} m_{ii} = (n-k) a_k .

Moreover we have

TrE/A(y)=πk+a1πk−1+⋯+ak−1π1+nak, \text{Tr}_{E/A}(y) = \pi_k + a_1 \pi_{k-1} + \cdots + a_{k-1} \pi_1 + n a_k ,

whence formula (26) follows.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.