Definition 2
Tag 0DKI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0DKI].
Algebra, chapter IX, § 3. Formes hermitiennes et formes quadratiques
We suppose that the ring is commutative. We say that a mapping of into is a quadratic form on if 1) for and ; 2) the mapping of into is a bilinear form. The bilinear form (which is necessarily symmetric) is called the bilinear form associated with . If is non-degenerate, we say that is non-degenerate.
Since , it follows at once from 2) that
We shall say that two elements (resp. two subsets) of are orthogonal relative to if they are orthogonal relative to the bilinear form associated with .
Let be a family of elements of and a family of elements of all but a finite number of which are zero. By induction on the number of indices for which , one easily shows that
the last summation being extended over the two-element subsets of I.
For every bilinear form on , we define a quadratic form by putting ; the bilinear form associated with is then defined by for in . Moreover, if one supposes that the scalar 2 has an inverse in , there exists one and only one symmetric bilinear form such that , namely ; the discriminant of with respect to a system is also called the discriminant of with respect to . There is therefore in this case a one-to-one correspondence between the quadratic forms and the symmetric bilinear forms on (cf. exerc. 6).
In the case of a free module, we have in addition the following result:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.