Remarks
Tag 0EEN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0EEN].
Algebra, chapter V, § 4. Algebraically closed extensions
1) For each let be a non-zero element of and let . Then it is clear that every splitting extension for the family , is also a splitting extension for the family and conversely. In particular, in studying splitting extensions we may limit ourselves to the case of monic polynomials.
2) Suppose that I is finite and put . Using the uniqueness of the decomposition of a polynomial into irreducible factors in (IV, p. 13, Prop. 13), we can easily show that a splitting extension for the polynomial is a splitting extension for the family , and conversely. In other words, the case of a finite family may be reduced to the case of a single polynomial.
3) Let be a polynomial of degree and let be a splitting extension of . If are the roots off in , we thus have and is finite (, p. 18, Th. 2); but it may happen that is distinct from the subfields generated by a single root; this can happen even when is irreducible. We note however that when is irreducible, the fields all have the same degree over , and whenever is equal to one of them, we have and hence .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Nothing.