Bourbaki

Exercise 24, § 1

Integration, VII, p. 84

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

a) In R\mathbf{R}, let AA (resp. BB) be the set of numbers xx whose proper dyadic expansion x=x0+∑i=1∞xi2−ix = x_0 + \sum_{i=1}^\infty x_i 2^{-i} (x0x_0 an integer, xi=0x_i = 0 or xi=1x_i = 1 for i≥1i \geq 1) is such that xi=0x_i = 0 for ii even and >0> 0 (resp. ii odd). Show that, for Lebesgue measure, AA and BB have measure zero but A+B=RA + B = \mathbf{R}.

b) Deduce from a) that there exists a basis HH of R\mathbf{R} (over Q\mathbf{Q}) contained in A∪BA \cup B, hence of measure zero. The set P1P_1 of numbers rhrh, where r∈Qr \in \mathbf{Q} and h∈Hh \in H, is also of measure zero.

c) Denote by PnP_n the set of real numbers at most nn of whose coordinates relative to the basis HH are nonzero. Show that if PnP_n is negligible and Pn+1P_{n+1} is measurable, then Pn+1P_{n+1} is negligible. (Let h0∈Hh_0 \in H; show first that the set SS of x∈Pn+1x \in P_{n+1} whose coordinate relative to h0h_0 is ≠0\neq 0, is negligible. Using Exer. 20, show that if Pn+1P_{n+1} were not negligible, there would exist two distinct points x′,x′′x', x'' of Pn+1∩CSP_{n+1} \cap \mathbf{C}S such that (x′−x′′)/h0(x' - x'')/h_0 is rational, and deduce from this a contradiction.)

d) Deduce from a) and b) that there exist in R\mathbf{R} two negligible sets C,DC, D such that C+DC + D is not measurable.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.