Proposition 5
Tag 000M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 000M].
Algebra, VIII, p. 7, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules
a) Let A be a left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian) ring, and let be a ring homomorphism that makes B into a finitely generated left A-module. The ring B is left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian).
b) Let A be a left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian) ring, and let be a two-sided ideal of A; the ring is left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian).
c) Let be a family of left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian) rings. The ring is left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian).
We will treat the case of Artinian rings; the case of Noetherian rings is analogous.
Let us prove a). By Proposition 4, the ring is an Artinian left A-module and a fortiori an Artinian left B-module.
Assertion b) follows from assertion a) applied to the canonical homomorphism from A to .
Let us prove c). Set . By assumption, is an Artinian left -module and a fortiori an Artinian left A-module. By Example 5 of VIII, p. 4, the A-module is Artinian.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.