Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 000M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 000M].

Algebra, VIII, p. 7, § 1. Artinian Modules and Noetherian Modules

a) Let A be a left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian) ring, and let φ:A→B\varphi : A\rightarrow B be a ring homomorphism that makes B into a finitely generated left A-module. The ring B is left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian).

b) Let A be a left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian) ring, and let a\mathfrak{a} be a two-sided ideal of A; the ring A/aA/\mathfrak{a} is left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian).

c) Let (Ai)i∈I(A_i)_{i\in I} be a family of left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian) rings. The ring ∏i∈IAi\prod_{i\in I}A_i is left Artinian (resp. left Noetherian).

We will treat the case of Artinian rings; the case of Noetherian rings is analogous.

Let us prove a). By Proposition 4, the ring BsB_s is an Artinian left A-module and a fortiori an Artinian left B-module.

Assertion b) follows from assertion a) applied to the canonical homomorphism from A to A/aA/\mathfrak{a}.

Let us prove c). Set A=∏i∈IAiA =\prod_{i\in I}A_i. By assumption, (Ai)s(A_i)_s is an Artinian left AiA_i-module and a fortiori an Artinian left A-module. By Example 5 of VIII, p. 4, the A-module AsA_s is Artinian.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.