Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0052, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0052].

Algebra, VIII, p. 71, § 4. Semisimple Modules

Let M and M′M' be semisimple A-modules, and consider descriptions ((Vλ)λ∈S,α)((V_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}}, \alpha ) and ((Vλ′)λ∈S,α′)((V'_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}}, \alpha ') of M and M′M', respectively. For every family f=(fλ)λ∈S\boldsymbol{f}= (f_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}} in ∏λ∈S\prod_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}} HomDλ(Vλ,Vλ′)_{D_{\lambda}}(V_{\lambda},V_{\lambda}'), there exists a unique A-linear mapping φ(f)∈\varphi (\boldsymbol{f})\in HomA(M,M′)_A(M,M') for which the following diagram commutes:

⨁(Sλ⊗DVλ)α\bigoplus(S_{\lambda}\otimes_DV_{\lambda})^{\alpha} // M

λ∈Sλ \lambda \in \mathscr{S}\lambda
⨁(1S⊗fλ) \bigoplus(1_S\otimes f_{\lambda})
λφ(f) _{\lambda}\varphi (\boldsymbol{f})
λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}

⨁(Sλ⊗DVλ′)α′\bigoplus(S_{\lambda}\otimes_DV'_{\lambda})^{\alpha'} // M′M'.

λ∈Sλ\lambda \in \mathscr{S}\lambda

The mapping φ:∏λ∈S\varphi :\prod_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}} HomDλ(Vλ,Vλ′)→_{D_{\lambda}}(V_{\lambda},V'_{\lambda})\rightarrow HomA(M,M′)_A(M,M') defined this way is a group isomorphism. When we have M=M′,Vλ=Vλ′M = M',V_{\lambda}= V'_{\lambda} for every λ∈S\lambda \in \mathscr{S}, and α=α′\alpha =\alpha ', the mapping φ\varphi is a ring isomorphism from ∏λ∈S\prod_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}} EndDλ(Vλ)_{D_{\lambda}}(V_{\lambda}) to EndA(M)_A(M).

In view of the description of the isotypical components of M and M′M' given in Proposition 8, a), this follows from Theorem 3 of VIII, p. 64 and Proposition 5, b) of VIII, p. 66.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.