Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 005Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 005Z].

Algebra, VIII, p. 86, § 5. Commutation

a) For every element cc of the bicommutant C of M and every λ∈SM\lambda \in \mathscr{S}_M, there exists a unique element cλc_{\lambda} of EndDλ(Sλ)_{D_{\lambda}}(S_{\lambda}) such that for every φ∈\varphi \in HomA(Sλ,M)_A(S_{\lambda},M) and every s∈Sλs\in S_{\lambda}, we have cφ(s)=φ(cλs)c\varphi (s) =\varphi (c_{\lambda}s).

b) Endow the SλS_{\lambda}, for λ\lambda running through SM\mathscr{S}_M, with the C-module structure defined by a). Then the canonical mapping αM\alpha_M from ⨁λ∈SMSλ⊗DλVλ\bigoplus_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}_M}S_{\lambda}\otimes_{D_{\lambda}}V_{\lambda} to M is an isomorphism of (C,Bo)(C,B^o)-bimodules.

c) The mapping c↦(cλ)λ∈SMc\mapsto (c_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}_M} is an isomorphism from C to ∏λ∈SM\prod_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}_M} EndDλ(Sλ)_{D_{\lambda}}(S_{\lambda}).

Assertions a) and c) follow from VIII, p. 71, Proposition 9 because the canonical mapping αM\alpha_M from ⨁λ∈S(Sλ⊗DλWλ)\bigoplus_{\lambda\in\mathscr{S}}(S_{\lambda}\otimes_{D_{\lambda}}W_{\lambda}) to M provides a description of the B-module M (Remark 2). Moreover, αM\alpha_M is (C,Bo(C,B^o)-linear, which proves b).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.