Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 00JA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00JA].

Algebra, VIII, p. 312, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group

Let G be a finite group, H be a subgroup of G, and E be a Galois algebra over the field K with group H. Then the (K,G)(K,G)-algebra CoindHG(E)^G_H(E) deduced from E by coinduction from H to G is a Galois algebra over the field K with group G.

Since E is a Galois algebra over K, by property (v) of Theorem 2 of VIII, p. 308, it is reduced, we have Card(H) = [E : K], and K is the ring of invariants of H in E. But by Lemma 7 of VIII, p. 305, the algebra F = CoindHG(E)^G_H(E) is reduced, and we have

[F : K] = (G : H)[E : K] = (G : H) Card(H) = Card(G),

and K is the ring of invariants of G in F. So F is a Galois algebra by the criterion given in Theorem 2, (v).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.