Theorem 2
Tag 00J1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00J1].
Algebra, VIII, p. 308, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group
Let G be a finite group, and let L be a commutative K-algebra of finite degree endowed with an action of G given by an injective homomorphism from G to Aut. The following properties are then equivalent:
(i) There exist a subgroup H of G, a Galois extension E of K of finite degree, an isomorphism from H to Gal(E), and an isomorphism of -algebras from L to Coind.
(ii) The algebra L is étale, and is a homogeneous principal G-set (I, §5, No. 6, p. 60, Definition 7).
(iii) There exists an isomorphism of -algebras ; in other words, for every , the automorphism of is equal to the automorphism
(iv) The algebra L is reduced, and L is a free K[G]-module of rank 1.
(v) The algebra L is reduced, we have Card(G) = [L : K], and K is the subring of L of elements invariant under the action of G.
(vi) The algebra L is reduced, the group G acts transitively on the set of maximal ideals of L, and, for every maximal ideal of L, the stabilizer of in G acts faithfully on and admits K as subfield of invariants.
(i)(ii): Let E be a Galois extension of K of finite degree and an isomorphism from H to Aut. Let S be a system of representatives of the right cosets of G modulo H. The K-algebra F = Coind is isomorphic to (Lemma 7, a)); it is therefore étale. We denote by the action of G on F. Furthermore, let be a K-algebra homomorphism from E to Ω, and let be the homomorphism from F to Ω. Let be such that we have ; since is injective, we then have for every . In view of Lemma 7, a), we have , and by the formula
which holds for every , this can only happen if . On the other hand, by Lemma 7, b) and Theorem 3 of V, §10, No. 6, p. 66, we have
[F : K] = (G : H)[E : K] = (G : H) Card(H) = Card(G).
The set of K-homomorphisms from F to Ω has cardinal [F : K] because F is étale (V, §6, No. 5, p. 32, Proposition 4), so Card() Card(G). Since the stabilizer of in G is equal to by the above, is a homogenous principal G-set.
(ii)(iii): Suppose that L is étale and that is a homogenous principal G-set. By Lemma 10, the , G)-algebras and are isomorphic. Since is a homogenous principal G-set, the , G)-algebras and are isomorphic.
(iii)(iv): Suppose that property (iii) holds. Then is a free module of rank 1 over the algebra Ω[G]; the latter can be canonically identified with . We then apply Theorem 3 of VIII, p. 37.
The implication (iv)(v) is immediate.
Let us prove the implication (v)(vi). The algebra L is reduced. By Lemma 8, c), the group G acts transitively on the set of maximal ideals of L. Let be an element of . By Lemma 9, since , the algebra L is isomorphic to the algebra Coind. The algebra of invariants of in therefore coincides with K by Lemma 7, c). Hence the homomorphism from to Gal((L)) is surjective. By Lemma 7, we moreover have
Card(G) . So Card(G) , and the homomorphism is injective.
It remains to prove the implication (vi)(i). Let be a maximal ideal of L. By Lemma 9, the algebra L is isomorphic to the algebra Coind as a , G)-algebra. Since acts faithfully in and admits K as subfield of invariants, the group homomorphism defines an isomorphism from to Gal((L)).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Definition 1, § 16
- Lemma 12, § 16
- Example 1, § 16
- Example 2, § 16
- Remark 2, § 16
- Remark 3, § 16
- Remark 5, § 16
- Proposition 10, § 16
- Proposition 9, § 16
Cites
- I, §5, No. 6, p. 60, Definition 7 not in this corpus
- Theorem 3 of V, §10, No. 6, p. 66 not in this corpus
- V, §6, No. 5, p. 32, Proposition 4 not in this corpus
- Lemma 10
- Lemma 7
- Lemma 8
- Lemma 9
- Theorem 3 of VIII, p. 37