Bourbaki

Lemma 7

Tag 00IX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00IX].

Algebra, VIII, p. 305, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group

a) Let S be a subset of G such that every element of G can be written uniquely as hshs with h∈Hh\in H and s∈Ss\in S. Then the mapping that sends ff to (f(s))s∈S(f(s))_{s\in S} is an isomorphism from the K-algebra CoindHG(E)^G_H(E) to the K-algebra F(S,E)\mathscr{F}(S,E) of mappings from S to E.

b) The algebra CoindHG(E)^G_H(E) has finite degree over K if and only if E has finite degree over K and the index of H in G is finite. In this case, we have the formula

[CoindHG(E):K]=(G:H)[E:K]^G_H(E) : K] = (G : H)[E : K].

c) Let EHE^H be the algebra of invariants of the group H in E and CoindHG(E)G^G_H(E)^G that of the group G in CoindHG(E)^G_H(E). The mapping f↦f(e)f\mapsto f(e) from CoindHG(E)^G_H(E) to E restricts to an algebra isomorphism from CoindHG(E)G^G_H(E)^G to EHE^H.

Assertion a) follows from the definitions and implies b). By (15), a mapping from G to E is an element of CoindHG(E)^G_H(E) invariant under G if and only if it is constant with value an element of E invariant under H.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.